Can we at least remove the stuff that we know does not work? It should be
straightforward to just remove it from explorer.xml.
Thanks,
Om
On Aug 20, 2014 9:00 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
> On 8/20/14 7:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> >
> >> MX controls deal with that, but I don't think Spark
Hi Patel,
Yes for example Flash Develop -> http://www.flashdevelop.org/
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Related-to-IDE-tp39862p39863.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mai
Hi,
One of my friend asked me related to license .
is there any free IDE in which he can do the code of Apache flex .
because there are some 250$ fee for the adobe flash builder 4.7
so is there any open source free IDE to work into that?.
Regards
Amit
On 8/20/14 7:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> MX controls deal with that, but I don't think Spark
>> controls do.
>So that would be a bug then?
IMO, yes, but I think last time I looked into it, the load is done by OSMF
which we can't change. They probably wouldn't want to use our
mx.utils.Lo
Hi,
> The problem with VideoPlayer is that it is looking for the mp4 in the
> wrong place. Well, it is the right place when run on its own, but when a
> SWF is loaded by another SWF, relative paths are fixed up against the
> first SWF loaded.
Thanks for finding the issue. At least we can fix that
Oh no the things I changed were very minor. a couple cosmetic and one
default preference. No stoppers there.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Well if a new release is cut lets get in my change in there too.
>
> A release only required 3+1 votes and more +1 tha
I put TDF on localhost. The OSMFExample still doesn't show video, and
VideoPlayer still doesn't work.
The problem with VideoPlayer is that it is looking for the mp4 in the
wrong place. Well, it is the right place when run on its own, but when a
SWF is loaded by another SWF, relative paths are fi
Looks like VideoDisplayExample is missing from the compile-spark target.
That would explain why we'd get a "swf not loaded" image.
For me the OSMFExample (second "VideoDisplay" link in the tree) plays
sound, but the vid is black. I can seek through the video just fine. I
just get audio.
The las
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:53 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > One issue that I would like to see fixed:
>> > Spark Framework Components > Visual Components > General Controls has
>> two
>> > VideoDisplay components.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > One issue that I would like to see fixed:
> > Spark Framework Components > Visual Components > General Controls has two
> > VideoDisplay components. The first one is broken and does not work.
>
> Any idea what the issue may be?
>
Hi,
> Well if a new release is cut lets get in my change in there too.
A release only required 3+1 votes and more +1 than -1. Currently for that to
happen would require people to change their vote to -1 or more people vote -1
in the 72 hour period since voting ie in the next 24 hours
I'm not s
Hi,
> One issue that I would like to see fixed:
> Spark Framework Components > Visual Components > General Controls has two
> VideoDisplay components. The first one is broken and does not work.
Any idea what the issue may be?
Justin
Well if a new release is cut lets get in my change in there too.
-Mark
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:28 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> -1 Binding
>
> MD5 checksum matches
> Good signature from "Justin Mclean "
> Source package compiles fine
> README looks fine
>
> One issue that I would like to
-1 Binding
MD5 checksum matches
Good signature from "Justin Mclean "
Source package compiles fine
README looks fine
One issue that I would like to see fixed:
Spark Framework Components > Visual Components > General Controls has two
VideoDisplay components. The first one is broken and does not wo
+1
-Successful compiled
-Ran it and went through several sections (has lots of rough spots to be
ironed out in the future).
-Mark
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES
> and the README.
>
> Chan
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Mark Kessler
wrote:
> ok yeah the apache util repo defaults to master branch still, but the
> develop branch has quite a bit of stuff in there too.
>
>
If no one has objections, I will ask INFRA to make develop the default
branch for flex-utilities on Github.
>
ok yeah the apache util repo defaults to master branch still, but the
develop branch has quite a bit of stuff in there too.
Thanks Om, I'll just update the develop branch and let it get back on
schedule with the releases.
-Mark
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Mark Kessler
wrote:
> I see the default branch is the master branch, but the develop branch also
> has changes in it. Which one are we updating ATM?
>
>
Good question. Are you talking about master being default on github?
At some point when only Erik and I were
I see the default branch is the master branch, but the develop branch also
has changes in it. Which one are we updating ATM?
-Mark
Player was stuck. When I closed it the run continued, so instead of
aborting it, I'm going to let it try to finish.
On 8/20/14 4:01 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>Seems to have hung again, but maybe it's just a 'normal' hang ?
>
>Tom
>
>On 16/08/14 06:37, Alex Harui wrote:
>> This post:
>>
>>htt
+1
No issues found when compiling. Release notes and other documents looks
correct.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> +1
> Compiles in 45 minutes on Linux under 4.12
>
> Tom
>
> On 19/08/14 01:10, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a TourDeFlex Release Candida
Saw it! Thanks. Looks like mustella on our CI hung before your changes
so I'm going to reboot the server now and we'll see if it passes.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 8/20/14 7:46 AM, "Darrell Loverin" wrote:
>I recommitted the mustella changes to allow the test directory to be
>located outside of the mus
I recommitted the mustella changes to allow the test directory to be
located outside of the mustella source:
Branch: refs/heads/develop
Commit: 1f8c801d33406b7f1f6119fe93788f0c30fd5c73
Committed: Mon Aug 18 21:46:03 2014 -0400
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> It passed on
Seems to have hung again, but maybe it's just a 'normal' hang ?
Tom
On 16/08/14 06:37, Alex Harui wrote:
> This post:
> http://jenkins-ci.361315.n4.nabble.com/JIRA-core-JENKINS-22758-Jenkins-gt-1
> -560-breaks-Jenkins-slave-handling-NIO-JNLP-related-using-swarm--td4699957.
> html
>
> seems to re
+1
Compiles in 45 minutes on Linux under 4.12
Tom
On 19/08/14 01:10, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and
> the README.
>
> Changes from the last release candidate include:
> - Add missing files to package so all examples comp
25 matches
Mail list logo
