On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> You sure you won't need more of IUIBase like x,y,w,h?
>
>
On the AS side, flash.display.Shape would have those properties. On the
HTML/JS side, the x,y,w,h are part of the shape's description drawn in the
parent SVG's co-ordinate space.
There
You sure you won't need more of IUIBase like x,y,w,h?
I have an Ichild locally for some other reason right now. When I check it
in you can add addedToParent if you need it.
-Alex
On 9/17/14 4:54 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> O
I'm very pleased with this advancement FlatSpark. I am even more enthused to
work on skin for other components (eg: DataGrid)
-
Bruno Pacola
FlatSpark Skin: http://akamud.github.io/FlatSpark
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Accept-Fl
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/17/14 3:44 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >I was looking at making GraphicShape implement IUIBase.
> >
> >The AS interface has a bunch of method definitions
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/as/pr
On 9/17/14 3:44 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I was looking at making GraphicShape implement IUIBase.
>
>The AS interface has a bunch of method definitions
>https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/as/projects/Fl
>exJSUI/src/org/apache/flex/core/IUIBase.as
>
>The JS inter
I was looking at making GraphicShape implement IUIBase.
The AS interface has a bunch of method definitions
https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/as/projects/FlexJSUI/src/org/apache/flex/core/IUIBase.as
The JS interface is looking empty
https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/blo
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > These are the ones that won't work:
> >
> http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/?app=spark/controls/VideoDisplayExample
> > http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/?app=spark/controls/VideoPlayerExample
>
> Both of these work in 1.1 for me.
Hi,
> These are the ones that won't work:
> http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/?app=spark/controls/VideoDisplayExample
> http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/?app=spark/controls/VideoPlayerExample
Both of these work in 1.1 for me.
Justin
These are the ones that won't work:
http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/?app=spark/controls/VideoDisplayExample
http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/?app=spark/controls/VideoPlayerExample
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Om re Wrong paths for video in TourD
Hi,
The vote passes with 4 +1 binding votes, 2 +1 votes and no -1 votes.
Binding +1 votes:
Mark Kessler
Justin Mclean
OmPrakash Muppirala
Alex Huri
Other +1 votes:
Piotr
Chris Martin
Thanks,
Justin
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/17/14 9:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>
> >If we must use a browser, it would be better to wrap the swf inside a
> >shell
> >html. It is slightly more reliable that way. IE tries to download the
> >swf
> >as a file and Firef
On 9/17/14 9:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>If we must use a browser, it would be better to wrap the swf inside a
>shell
>html. It is slightly more reliable that way. IE tries to download the
>swf
>as a file and Firefox simply flakes out trying to run the swf.
This was literally my fi
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> There are separate runs.
>
> It should be ok to switch to Standalone if it helps. I think I just used
> the browser because either FlexUnit defaults to it, or I knew we needed
> one for the JS run anyway.
>
> I was planning to go look to see a
There are separate runs.
It should be ok to switch to Standalone if it helps. I think I just used
the browser because either FlexUnit defaults to it, or I knew we needed
one for the JS run anyway.
I was planning to go look to see about increasing the timeout for
FlexUnit, but haven't had time to
Should be there separate runs then. One of the swf's and one for the JS? Is
that possible?
-Mark
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > why are we opening the swf in a browser? Can we not open it in flash
> > player standalone like most other tests? That should get us off the
> > dependency on firefox.
> >
>
> It is my understanding that Alex used the Marmotinni setup fo
> why are we opening the swf in a browser? Can we not open it in flash
> player standalone like most other tests? That should get us off the
> dependency on firefox.
>
It is my understanding that Alex used the Marmotinni setup for these tests.
That is basically a Java wrapper around the Selenium
OK, great. I have been experimenting with graphics with large numbers of
points to see how well a lot of elements works on the Javascript
side. Ran into some internal charting thing that is giving me multiple
curves, so I have to track that down. I think we'll probably wind up with
a package of ch
I think I was the one who checked in the trace statement which has since
been removed. Hopefully that will fix the build.
But yes, the flakiness has been primarily because of the test runner
invoking Firefox which seems to hang most of the time. That reminds me,
why are we opening the swf in a b
It has been very flaky. It used to fail on a FlexUnit timeout 3 out of 4
times, but this failure is because somebody checked in a trace statement.
I'm trying to finish up a series of commits so I haven't pulled and found
out where, but I hope to get to it today or tomorrow if someone doesn't
beat
Thanks for taking your time testing and posting, the more feedback the FD
team gets, the better for them.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlashDevelop-Mac-Linux-news-and-request-for-feedback-tp40751p40758.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Devel
I don't think I've ever seen the flex-asjs build work. It's been broken
since the 13th.
It seems to be a problem with the test runner not seeing the test result
one way or the other ?
Tom
On 15/09/14 22:09, Alex Harui wrote:
> The basic tests failed. It detected an unexpected trace output, usual
I've replied there with details, but it didn't work for me (Ubuntu /
Wine 1.7).
Tom
On 16/09/14 21:41, Neverbirth wrote:
> As the subject says, there have been several advancements in both the Wine
> and FD sides, and the application now runs pretty well on both platforms.
> The FD team is asking
23 matches
Mail list logo
