Hi,
> I think Justin is suggesting that we store more of the installer
> intelligence on the server.
Yes currently it spread out between 3 xml files, and given we depend on things
who location could change and gives us a more flexibility in changing how
previous versions are installed.
> Just
Hi,
> Are you suggesting that we change the install experience for 4.13.0 and
> older releases?
Yes I can see users wanting to install Flex Unit (or Tour De Flex) as an
optional install while installing the SDK.
> One advantage of having all of the steps in the ant script is that our Linux
> u
I think Justin is suggesting that we store more of the installer
intelligence on the server. Justin, do you see a copy of the installer
scripts live on the server, ready for us to manipulate without a VOTE? I
like that suggestion, it would separate the interests of the various part
even better (i.e
Thanks folks, for your work on this! We really appreciate it. Having a
true, cross-platform, open-source alternative to Flash Builder would be a
big deal for Apache Flex.
For those who are interested in helping this initiative, for my part, I
recently contributed to the IndieGoGo project that su
On 10/9/14, 10:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I tried twice and both times failed on the Jburg checksum because the
>> installer is going to get an html file instead of the jar. Was that one
>> of the more common failures?
>
>Strangely enough no - I guess it could be reporting the wro
Hi,
> I tried twice and both times failed on the Jburg checksum because the
> installer is going to get an html file instead of the jar. Was that one
> of the more common failures?
Strangely enough no - I guess it could be reporting the wrong error?
Justin
I tried twice and both times failed on the Jburg checksum because the
installer is going to get an html file instead of the jar. Was that one
of the more common failures?
-Alex
On 10/9/14, 10:11 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> This is the same downloads.soureforge.net problem. Running fr
Hi,
> This is the same downloads.soureforge.net problem. Running from ant
> should work, but the installer can¹t get the binaries. There¹s no
> workaround for it in the current ant scripts so the best we can do is fix
> the nightly build.
The errors are quite varied so not 100% sure that's the
This is the same downloads.soureforge.net problem. Running from ant
should work, but the installer can¹t get the binaries. There¹s no
workaround for it in the current ant scripts so the best we can do is fix
the nightly build.
No response yet on my SourceForge support ticket.
-Alex
On 10/9/14,
On 10/9/14, 5:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>The second requires it being added to the SDK install scripts. This is a
>little problematic in that the steps are part of each SDK release in the
>dist area. I'm assuming we can't we change the contents of those without
>VOTEing on a release.
>
>Woul
Hi,
Tour de flex is coming up on it 10,000 views and the download page viewed 1000
times. There was a few days we didn't record stats so safe to assume we've
passed both of those "milestones".
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Over the last month we've had more than 1000 errors trying to download osmf,
but most of these occurred in the last week.
The other download seem more problematic over the last month and a bit we've
had:
- 230 or so errors for agij40.jar
- 80 or so errors for afe.jar
Both of these have a h
Hi,
Installing FlexJS is currently giving a 100% error rate. 30 failures out of 30
in the last 2 days. Various errors include a few odd ones but the usual 2032
error is most common (11 out of 30).
Justin
Hi,
For 4.13:
Success:
windows 225
osx 78
Most common errors (not all counted):
windows unable to create directory 68
error 2032 24
windowsError 22
agij.jar download failed 13
SDK MD5 check 13
AIR download failed 6
mirror URL error 6 (not seen this before)
There's now only a couple of osmf err
Hi,
The rate is now done to 100-150/day which is still high but not 450+/day it
peaked at in the last week.
Justin
Mailing list instructions are here [1]
-Alex
[1] http://flex.apache.org/community-mailinglists.html
On 10/9/14, 2:38 PM, "Kyungsuk Song" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I want to subscribe this mailing list.
>
>Is it possible? Or Any other steps for this?
>
>
>
>Best Regards,
>Kyungsuk Song > SENIOR SOFTWARE E
Hi,
I been looking at adding Flex Unit to the installer and it occurred to me that
we may want to add it in two places.
1. As a stand alone product (ie shows in first list along with the various SDKS)
2. As an optional part of installing an SDK
1 makes sense if you have already installed the SDK
Hi,
My understating of bundling category B software is that it OK to include the
binary, and you only need to prompt the user to download the source. [1] So
what we are doing goes beyond what is the minimal legal requirement. Do you
need to agree to licence terms when you use firefox for instan
On Oct 9, 2014 2:02 PM, "quick6black" wrote:
>
> i started textarea and textinput, should have something tomorrow. Can you
> update the wiki page please
>
Awesome. I will update it soon.
Can you please make sure that you start from the Android skins from the
repo? I had made scrolling related
Hi,
I want to subscribe this mailing list.
Is it possible? Or Any other steps for this?
Best Regards,
Kyungsuk Song > SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R & D
http://www.xaxis.com
i started textarea and textinput, should have something tomorrow. Can you
update the wiki page please
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/iOS7-component-skinning-was-Re-Apache-Flex-4-14-achievements-and-goals-tp40987p41214.html
Sent from
On 10/9/14, 12:49 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>IMO, the LICENSE we show for the main package would have the MPL stuff in
>> it, not just the AL license, so then there wouldn¹t be a checkbox to
>>check.
>>
>
>Ah, this is so much better than what I had proposed. Just add the MPL
>license te
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/9/14, 12:34 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >> The set of required and optional steps for new installs is determined
> >>by a
> >> config file. The FlexJS install, for
On 10/9/14, 12:34 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> The set of required and optional steps for new installs is determined
>>by a
>> config file. The FlexJS install, for example, doesn¹t offer or install
>> OSMF. I think we can control e
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The set of required and optional steps for new installs is determined by a
> config file. The FlexJS install, for example, doesn’t offer or install
> OSMF. I think we can control everything from the config file and
> installer.xml, which woul
The set of required and optional steps for new installs is determined by a
config file. The FlexJS install, for example, doesn’t offer or install
OSMF. I think we can control everything from the config file and
installer.xml, which would be desirable for our Linux users anyway.
-Alex
On 10/9/14
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Why do we need to change the installer? What part can’t be done in the
> ant script?
>
Is it possible to stop OSMF download by just changing the installer.xml?
I was also thinking about changing the wording from 'optional' to
'required', and
Why do we need to change the installer? What part can’t be done in the
ant script?
On 10/9/14, 12:10 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> No particular objection. Are you suggesting we go back and re-release
>>all
>> previous releases or is
On 10/9/14, 12:04 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>I just realized that OSMF is already a 'required' component. So ignore
>this point.
I was surprised by this as well. I¹m not sure if that is true for the
binary package.
IMO, if you are not using Spark Video, it shouldn¹t matter if that SW
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> No particular objection. Are you suggesting we go back and re-release all
> previous releases or is this just for the future?
>
I think just for future. This requires a change to both the SDK (release
build script) as well as the Installer.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:52 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> How about we download the OSMF swc during the release build stage and
> package it with the SDK artifact like we do other third party dependencies
> like Batik, Velocity and Xerces?
>
> Pros:
> * Since we resolve this dependency during
No particular objection. Are you suggesting we go back and re-release all
previous releases or is this just for the future?
I¹m not sure OSMF is the main culprit for failed downloads. AIR was more
likely to choke for me in recent testing.
-Alex
On 10/9/14, 11:52 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrot
How about we download the OSMF swc during the release build stage and
package it with the SDK artifact like we do other third party dependencies
like Batik, Velocity and Xerces?
Pros:
* Since we resolve this dependency during build time, end users don't get
affected by Sourceforge downtimes
* If S
I do :-)
*>*
I don't see anything but whitespace between these.
- Gordon
> On Oct 6, 2014, at 11:29 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
Try using event.currentTarget.parent ?
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Konovalov [mailto:oleg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 7:27 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Which panel?
Hi,
I have a bunch of Panels on the Form,
each having Submit and Cancel buttons. So when user p
If you give the buttons an id, you can see that in event.currentTarget.
Tom
PS this query may be better directed to users@
On 09/10/14 14:56, Oleg Konovalov wrote:
Hi,
I have a bunch of Panels on the Form,
each having Submit and Cancel buttons. So when user presses Cancel, how do
I determine f
Hi,
I have a bunch of Panels on the Form,
each having Submit and Cancel buttons. So when user presses Cancel, how do
I determine from which Panel it came?
Looks like I can't get it from event.currentTarget.panentDocumentI will
need to hide that panel.
Please advise.
TIA,
Oleg.
+1 to making develop the default
-Mark
39 matches
Mail list logo
