Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

On 11/19/14, 2:04 PM, "Mahmoud Ali" wrote: >I think I'm a little late, from what I'm seeing this was just a problem >with RAT and not with the licenses, right? That’s my understanding. Thanks for checking in. -Alex

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 1162 - Still Failing!

I have found the problem. It would have saved me much time if I had properly checked that TLF was in sync on my machine. A recent and seemingly correct change by Fred was the culprit. You can’t do null tests on Strings and Numbers with just "if (foo)”. I’ve been burned by this in the past. See

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

I think I'm a little late, from what I'm seeing this was just a problem with RAT and not with the licenses, right? Also, It looks like this is all resolved by now. If I can help with anything on this, just let me know.

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

Reverted and added exclude. Thanks for you patience! I won't claim to understand any of this, but I'm glad we found an easy solution and managed to deflect and long drawn out discussion ;-) EdB On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Sorry, I agree it is very confusing. IMO, t

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

Sorry, I agree it is very confusing. IMO, there are two choices based on the repo before you made changes: 1) just add the two OFL.txt files to the RAT excludes. 2) copy the entirety of the two OFL.txt files including the copyrights into LICENSE and don’t touch NOTICE. My understanding is that w

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex 1.2 RC1

While researching an answer for Erik, I found the information I was looking for on Wikipedia attributions [1]. So listing the URL for the wikipedia content is the attribution that goes into NOTICE, so just fixing the URL in NOTICE should be sufficient. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:R

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

And: why does this have to be so difficult? Between the NOTICE and the LICENSE it is very clear who own the copyright to - and which license applies to - the fonts. What more can one want, or why would you do less, given that the fonts are open source? EdB On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Erik

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

Nope. You lost me completely. Shall I revert and leave it to the experts? Or can you tell me what to change, without explaining why, please? EdB On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/19/14, 11:35 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > >I followed some of the other 'external'

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

On 11/19/14, 11:35 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >I followed some of the other 'external' licenses, which have a copy of the >license in LICENSE (with a sentence explaining to what it applies) and the >original copy right claims of the authors in NOTICE (with a mention of the >applicable license).

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

I followed some of the other 'external' licenses, which have a copy of the license in LICENSE (with a sentence explaining to what it applies) and the original copy right claims of the authors in NOTICE (with a mention of the applicable license). I have just committed my changes, feel free to review

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

Sorry this is late, I was deep in Mustella crap. It would have been sufficient to simply add those files as excludes to RAT. The recommendation in the LICENSE and NOTICE how-to is for pointers. But if you want to copy the OFL License into LICENSE, just copy it as-is, I don’t think you are suppos

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex 1.2 RC1

On 11/19/14, 8:58 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >I probably won't have time to do that until after ApacheCon and I'm back >in Australia. I'd suggest we release what we have now. Are you suggesting releasing RC1 with the NOTICE that points to freesound instead of wikipedia? I’ll be happy to change

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex 1.2 RC1

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > And from [3]: "Do not add anything to NOTICE which is not legally > > required." > > That correct but attribution IS legally required. Any license that > requires attribution needs to be added to NOTICE. I checked with a member > h

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

My guess would be: add license from file to LICENSE, add attributions and notifications to NOTICE and remove both 'OFL.txt' files altogether? EdB On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Hi, > > Imagine that, me needing 'legal' advise ;-) > > There are two files that came with

Re: [SDK] missing license headers in license file?

Hi, > /frameworks/projects/flatspark/src/flatspark/assets/fonts/awesome/OFL.txt > and > /frameworks/projects/flatspark/src/flatspark/assets/fonts/lato/OFL.txt OFL is category B and as per [1] "Software under the following licenses may be included in binary form within an Apache product if the in

[SDK] missing license headers in license file?

Hi, Imagine that, me needing 'legal' advise ;-) There are two files that came with the FlatSpark theme donation: /frameworks/projects/flatspark/src/flatspark/assets/fonts/awesome/OFL.txt and /frameworks/projects/flatspark/src/flatspark/assets/fonts/lato/OFL.txt and Rat complains about these not

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex 1.2 RC1

Hi, > And from [3]: "Do not add anything to NOTICE which is not legally > required." That correct but attribution IS legally required. Any license that requires attribution needs to be added to NOTICE. I checked with a member here at ApacheCon and they confirmed that is the case. > I wish I’d

Re: Code Signing Service

Hi, > Would/could/should we use this for Installer and TDF Mobile? Already discussed with Infra at ApacheCon and set things in motion. Some of the details are NDA so I'll post once I'm clear what is allowed to be. Thanks, Justin

Re: [SDK] during prep phase, switch 'flex-sdk-release' to release branch

> > I’ll tweak the installer config for you. Just remind me when the build > finishes so I can verify the URLs to the artifacts. > Thanks. I won't start the new build job until after I cut the release branch, so that'll be a couple of weeks at least. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luyken

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 1162 - Still Failing!

OK, putting on my mucking boots. From: Erik de Bruin mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl>> Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 at 8:40 AM To: "dev@flex.apache.org" mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>, Alex Harui mailto:aha...@adobe.com>> Subject: Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 1162 -

Re: [SDK] during prep phase, switch 'flex-sdk-release' to release branch

I’ll tweak the installer config for you. Just remind me when the build finishes so I can verify the URLs to the artifacts. On 11/19/14, 8:46 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Reacting to both replies: > >I have set up another job, ready to go - the Maven Way (tm) :-P - but >making that new 'release'

Code Signing Service

Don’t know if folks saw this: https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/code_signing_service_now_available shortened to: http://s.apache.org/4a5 Would/could/should we use this for Installer and TDF Mobile? -Alex

Re: [SDK] during prep phase, switch 'flex-sdk-release' to release branch

Reacting to both replies: I have set up another job, ready to go - the Maven Way (tm) :-P - but making that new 'release' job's artefacts available to testers through the Installer would mean tweaking the Installer config. I'd rather not do that, I'm trying to keep this release as simple as possib

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 1162 - Still Failing!

Alex, The build is disabled, so you should have all the artefacts from this 'failed' build at your disposal. It looks to be the same two failures that have been plaguing us for a long time, so I hope you'll be able to figure out what's wrong. Thanks, EdB On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:29 PM, wrot

AW: [SDK] during prep phase, switch 'flex-sdk-release' to release branch

How about doing it the maven way? ;-) At the day of the release branch, keep the version in the release branch and increment the version of develop. Create a second Jenkins job. One building the release branch and one the develop. Having the Installer give the user 2 options. "Release Build SNA

Re: [SDK] during prep phase, switch 'flex-sdk-release' to release branch

On 11/19/14, 8:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Hi, > >I'm looking for ideas or alternate viewpoints on the following: I plan to >switch the 'flex-sdk-release' job, which produces the Nightly Builds, to >the release branch, as soon as I cut one for the upcoming release. The >idea >behind this is

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex 1.2 RC1

> > Or how about this alternative? Since you aren’t linking to text from > wikipedia and instead are copying text from wikipedia, how about we copy > text from blogs.apache.org/flex? Then we can avoid this whole > LICENSE/NOTICE issue completely. > +1 This sounds like a supremely practical way

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex 1.2 RC1

On 11/19/14, 12:23 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >>dActually, I looked and it is in LICENSE. Did we need this section in >> NOTICE at all? > >I believe so for the attribution. [1] says NOTICE may need to change. [2] >states that: >"Many of these licenses have specific attribution terms that need t

[SDK] during prep phase, switch 'flex-sdk-release' to release branch

Hi, I'm looking for ideas or alternate viewpoints on the following: I plan to switch the 'flex-sdk-release' job, which produces the Nightly Builds, to the release branch, as soon as I cut one for the upcoming release. The idea behind this is that we give testers access to the pre-RC release builds

Updated Flex-SDK to use apache-flex blazeds :-)

Hi guys :-) I just updated the build job on build.apache.org to keep the latest successful artifacts and then the flex-sdk build to download and use that library instead of the one of the Adobe Flex SDK. I did try to do it correct and gave the build a spin after that. All seems to have went we

Re: New team members!

Wow, welcome one and all ! Tom On 19/11/14 08:00, Erik de Bruin wrote: Hi, I'm proud to introduce the newest additions to the Apache Flex team: Curtis Aube, Neil Madsen and Jorge Yabra are now committers, while Mihai Chira and Chris Martin have been appointed as PMC members. Please join me i

RE: New team members!

Welcome -Mike

RE: New team members!

Congratulations and welcome :) -Mark -Original Message- From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 3:00 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: New team members! Hi, I'm proud to introduce the newest additions to the Apache Flex team: Curtis Aube, Ne

RE: New team members!

Hi all, congrats ! Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 02:02:31 -0800 > From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: New team members! > > Welcome! :) > > Piotr > > > > - > Apache Flex PMC > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > -- > View this message in context:

Re: New team members!

Welcome! :) Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/New-team-members-tp42495p42512.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: New team members!

Welcome all! It’s great to see the family growing! Harbs On Nov 19, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Hi, > > I'm proud to introduce the newest additions to the Apache Flex team: > > Curtis Aube, Neil Madsen and Jorge Yabra are now committers, while Mihai > Chira and Chris Martin hav

AW: New team members!

Welcome :-) Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. November 2014 10:51 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: New team members! Welcome all! Congratulations and great to see you all aboard! :) 2014-11-19 9:00 G

Re: New team members!

Welcome all! Congratulations and great to see you all aboard! :) 2014-11-19 9:00 GMT+01:00 Erik de Bruin : > Hi, > > I'm proud to introduce the newest additions to the Apache Flex team: > > Curtis Aube, Neil Madsen and Jorge Yabra are now committers, while Mihai > Chira and Chris Martin have bee

Re: Commit of table work

For some reason tests didn't launch. I have to analyze your ant output and compare with mine. I see that Flow.swf launched without a problem - This is module you can see at the bottom. Pete - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-de

Re: Commit of table work

I don’t see any progress. Here’s what I see: https://www.evernote.com/shard/s143/sh/0264fd2e-1d63-4887-9a9f-a4c8a8103238/184e2fee807124f8f0b29694c69ff569 I feel like I’m groping in the dark. I have no idea what any of this is doing… On Nov 19, 2014, at 11:09 AM, piotrz wrote: > Did tests start

Re: Commit of table work

Did tests start ? Or there is no progress ? bin\apps\automation_apps\bin\ - Do you have in this location html wrapper for VellumUnit.swf ? You could try to launch it in web browser to see whether tests are launching. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message i

Re: Commit of table work

I changed the default app on my machine to open swf files to the Flash Player Debugger. I got further now, but I don’t think I got as far as you: flexunnit_tests: [flexunit] Validating task attributes ... [flexunit] Generating default values ... [flexunit] Using default working dir [/Users/h

Re: Commit of table work

I assume the problem is here: [flexunit] Executing 'open' with arguments: [flexunit] '/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/flex-tlf/bin/apps/automation_apps/bin/VellumUnit.swf' [flexunit] [flexunit] The ' characters around the executable and arguments are [flexunit] not part of the command. I’

Re: Commit of table work

I just added flexdebug = true It’s now opening VellumUnit in Flash CS5 and stalling in the same place. Suggestions? BTW, I recently started seeing this in the output when building tlf: Please use CMSClassUnloadingEnabled in place of CMSPermGenSweepingEnabled in the future I believe it started

Re: Commit of table work

The Flash Player app? It doesn’t use the browser? On Nov 19, 2014, at 10:42 AM, piotrz wrote: > Harbs, > > Did Flash Player launch for you ? Probably unit tests couldn't launch flash > player. I don't have access to my dev environment now maybe should be setted > path to the FlashPlayer.exe som

Re: Commit of table work

Harbs, Did Flash Player launch for you ? Probably unit tests couldn't launch flash player. I don't have access to my dev environment now maybe should be setted path to the FlashPlayer.exe somewhere... I will check later today and let you know. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail

Re: Commit of table work

Here’s the full output: http://pastebin.com/RLCg8XGb On Nov 19, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Harbs wrote: > After running ant all, these are the only files I see in that bin folder: > > automation_core.swc > automation_tests.swc > Flow.swf > swfobject.js > VellumUnit.html > VellumUnit.swf > > On Nov 19,

Re: Commit of table work

After running ant all, these are the only files I see in that bin folder: automation_core.swc automation_tests.swc Flow.swf swfobject.js VellumUnit.html VellumUnit.swf On Nov 19, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Harbs wrote: > What’s this about? > > flexunnit_tests: > [flexunit] Validating task attributes

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex 1.2 RC1

Hi, >> Sorry, looks like I missed that. I assume you meant to point to >> Wikipedia? Why is it in NOTICE and not in LICENSE? The content looks >> like it is CC-BY-SA which is Category A Which may still require changes to the NOTICE file and not just from information in other NOTICE files. >

Re: Commit of table work

What’s this about? flexunnit_tests: [flexunit] Validating task attributes ... [flexunit] Generating default values ... [flexunit] Using default working dir [/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/flex-tlf] [flexunit] Using the following settings for the test run: [flexunit] FLEX_HOME: [/User

Re: Commit of table work

Hi Harbs, > 1) Do you mean the build.properties in flex-tlf? in flex-sdk? or somewhere > else? I mean flex-tlf build.properties > 2) I’m not sure what you mean about FLEX_HOME. Is there something special > I need to do there besides what I’d do to make the SDK build? You have to create file e

New team members!

Hi, I'm proud to introduce the newest additions to the Apache Flex team: Curtis Aube, Neil Madsen and Jorge Yabra are now committers, while Mihai Chira and Chris Martin have been appointed as PMC members. Please join me in welcoming and congratulating them all! EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software