Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex 4.14.0

2014-12-19 Thread Alex Harui
Maybe because there is no difference in the LICENSE for source and binary packages? On 12/19/14, 5:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Anyone know why this is commented out in build.xml? > > > > >Thanks, >Justin

Re: FishEye accounts

2014-12-19 Thread Alex Harui
Interesting. I can reproduce your problem by logging in. Is INFRA responsible for FishEye? -Alex On 12/19/14, 11:42 AM, "Mihai Chira" wrote: >> I went to a couple of JIRA issues that had “1 commit” links and they >> worked for me. Is that what isn’t working for you? >Yes, that's the one I re

Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/release4.14.0] - minor changes/clarifications

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
>>> +- flex-blazeds (optional) >> >>Good catch, but is this optional in the current setup? > > I saw that too. IMO, not optional, but to further complicate matters, the > instructions have always been about how to get up from cloning the repo. > The TLF and now BlazeDS sources get packaged in

Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/release4.14.0] - minor changes/clarifications

2014-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Good catch, but is this optional in the current setup? Not sure but it was previously optional. I've not checked what happens if you don't have the blaze DS repo checked out. Justin

Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/release4.14.0] - minor changes/clarifications

2014-12-19 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/19/14, 10:52 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> +- flex-blazeds (optional) > >Good catch, but is this optional in the current setup? I saw that too. IMO, not optional, but to further complicate matters, the instructions have always been about how to get up from cloning the repo. The TLF

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex 4.14.0

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
> Currently 'ant clean' followed by 'ant main' fails to recompile the SDK with > the following error: > > BUILD FAILED > /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.14/build.xml:411: The following > error occurred while executing this line: > /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.14/modules/bui

Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/release4.14.0] - minor changes/clarifications

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
> +- flex-blazeds (optional) Good catch, but is this optional in the current setup? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

[4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 44: Successful

2014-12-19 Thread flex . ci . builds
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #44 - Successful Changes since last build: [bigosmallm] Now, if any ancestor chain of BusyIndicator becomes visible, it will start spinning. [bigosmallm] Add latest bug fix For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Mahmoud Ali
> > I found this link [1] for FlatSpark usage. Can we add this to the > RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page? > > It would be nice to have a wiki page for the TLF Tables as well. Harbs, > any chance you can get something like that up? This version is outdated so it can caus

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex 4.14.0

2014-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Currently 'ant clean' followed by 'ant main' fails to recompile the SDK with the following error: BUILD FAILED /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.14/build.xml:411: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.14/modules/build.xml:1

[4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 43: Successful

2014-12-19 Thread flex . ci . builds
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #43 - Successful Changes since last build: [jmclean] minor changes/clarifications For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/43/.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex 4.14.0

2014-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Anyone know why this is commented out in build.xml? Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex 4.14.0

2014-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, Also notice this when compiling - don't recall seeing that before. compile: [echo] Compiling frameworks/libs/framework.swc [compc] Loading configuration file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.14/frameworks/flex-config.xml [compc] Loading configuration file /Users/justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex 4.14.0

2014-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The installer ant script also ignores any locale settings and looks like it forces en_US. Looking at script it looks like en_US is hardcoded into it at one place? Adding -Dbundle=en_AU seem to mostly work but it should really be picking up the defaults in build.properties etc (and I woul

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex 4.14.0

2014-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The lastest READ tell you to run this to install the SDK: ant -f installer.xml -Dflash.sdk.version=15.0 -Dair.sdk.version=15.0 It makes all of the needed changes to the SDK re Flash Player and AIR version number but fails to expand the RSL build numbers in flex-config.xml. Also the script

[4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 42: Successful

2014-12-19 Thread flex . ci . builds
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #42 - Successful Changes since last build: [bigosmallm] Add link to wiki page with info on Promises [mihaic] FLEX-34564 Minor changes to spelling, punctuation, grammar and logic. For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudap

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I'd even consider taking the 'changing > the version' paragraph out entirely, as it seems that is an > exceedingly rare action. I'd leave it in.given that new versions of FP/AIR come out more frequently than we're currently releasing the SDK. I notice for instance that the build files are

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
> * Also, it's not clear whether "On Mac/Linux the AIR and Flash Player > version can be changed by running:" is optional or required. Should we > clarify that? I'd say that 'can be changed' should be enough indication that there is an original state/default... I'd even consider taking the 'changi

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
> BTW, the wiki page > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/AS3+Promises+-+a+guide+and+example > looks a incomplete. You might want to clean it up a bit. Yeah, I'll try to get to that next week... EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Mihai Chira
I just made a few changes to README, mostly cosmetic (see commit email). Some questions, while reading it: * "The Adobe Flash Player and Adobe AIR have excluded licenses so they can not be bundled with the Apache Flex SDK" - is that meant to be "exclusive"? * Also, it's not clear whether "On Mac/L

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
> RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page? He stated he is working on an updated version for the Flex Wiki. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I have added a link to the wiki page for Promises. I found this link [1] for FlatSpark usage. Can we add this to the RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page? It would be nice to have a wiki page for the TLF Tables as well. Harbs, any chance you can get something like that up?

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:52 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I have added a link to the wiki page for Promises. > BTW, the wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/AS3+Promises+-+a+guide+and+example looks a incomplete. You might want to clean it up a bit. Thanks, Om > > I

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
The README needs a bit about Java (1.)8 and the RELEASE_NOTES will be updated with any fixed JIRA tickets, but that's about it. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at them. Thanks, EdB On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t revi

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Alex Harui
I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES since they are still being worked on. I don’t know how to review CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in it. -Alex On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >So, the nice quiet on this t

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the current state of the legal docs? EdB On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > >>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are >>concerned? > > It

Re: FishEye accounts

2014-12-19 Thread Mihai Chira
> I went to a couple of JIRA issues that had “1 commit” links and they > worked for me. Is that what isn’t working for you? Yes, that's the one I referred to. I remember they worked for me too for a while, which is why I now noticed, as it felt like a regression. Is it working for you for all tick

Re: Re : Re: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful

2014-12-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 to send these emails to dev. There should not be too many of these and the intended audience are not going to be subscribed to commits@ Thanks On Dec 19, 2014 9:56 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > Thats a valid argument during a release, not out of IMO. > > Btw, wasnt able to get time to test

Re : Re: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful

2014-12-19 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Thats a valid argument during a release, not out of IMO. Btw, wasnt able to get time to test this rc but Im now on Holliday and will try to get some time from greece next week to have a look at it, hopefully Ill be able to --- Message initial --- De : "Alex Harui" Envoyé : 19 décembre 2014 1

Re: FishEye accounts

2014-12-19 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/19/14, 5:51 AM, "Mihai Chira" wrote: >> If the JIRA ticket is mention in the commit it will show up without >>fisheye. >That's true in the Activity tab, but not if you click on the "1 >commit" link on the right of the page. If people don't think it's >important, I can drop it. I went to

Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/release4.14.0] - Changed FlatSpark property to maintain proportions' name to 'fixedAspectRatio'

2014-12-19 Thread Alex Harui
You don’t have to make this change, but I just wanted to point out that SWFLoader has a property called ‘maintainAspectRatio’. Is this roughly the same thing? -Alex On 12/19/14, 2:04 AM, "aka...@apache.org" wrote: >Repository: flex-sdk >Updated Branches: > refs/heads/release4.14.0 307b0d86d -

Re: [4.13.0][FLEX-34689] SkinnableComponent change skin bug (Already solved, awaiting review by others)

2014-12-19 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/18/14, 11:58 PM, "DarkStone" wrote: > >So, I think we should do as you recommended in the last email, I will >revert the changes I made to SkinnableComponent on the 'develop' branch >of Flex SDK git, then we should update the Flex SkinnableComponent online >help: >http://help.adobe.com/en

Re: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful

2014-12-19 Thread Alex Harui
We could go with commits@, but I thought dev@ was better because the potential voters need to know what changed since they last formulated their opinion on the release and all of that discussion is going on dev@. -Alex On 12/19/14, 4:43 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote: >Why are these in the dev

Re: FishEye accounts

2014-12-19 Thread Mihai Chira
> If the JIRA ticket is mention in the commit it will show up without fisheye. That's true in the Activity tab, but not if you click on the "1 commit" link on the right of the page. If people don't think it's important, I can drop it.

Re: rc_flex-sdk_mustella-air - Build # 56 - Failure!

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
I'm having a fight with the Mustella VM. I recently made some changes and fixes, but it is having some residual issues... I expect the runs to clear up in the next day or so, so we may get some useful info from Mustella again. EdB On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:45 PM, wrote: > rc_flex-sdk_mustell

RE: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful

2014-12-19 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
Why are these in the dev emails instead commits? -Mark -Original Message- From: flex.ci.bui...@gmail.com [mailto:flex.ci.bui...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 7:26 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful flex-sdk_release-

[4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful

2014-12-19 Thread flex . ci . builds
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #41 - Successful Changes since last build: [erik] Updated with recently resolved JIRAs [erik] Updated with recently resolved JIRAs [akamud] Changed FlatSpark property to maintain proportions' name to 'fixedAspectRatio' For more information, check the console

Re: [4.14] Using the new iOS7+ and Android4+ skins

2014-12-19 Thread Tom Chiverton
Ace. I've made a few tweaks to the working, and droped the 'Apache Flex 14.0' prefix from the title, as very shortly it'll be live. Tom On 19/12/14 09:08, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: I have created a wiki page that discusses the new skins here [1] I have added a link to the same wiki page in t

Re: [INSTALLER] can't we make MD5 checking optional

2014-12-19 Thread Tom Chiverton
I certainly keep an eye on the CI servers, and finally sorted out access the the flex.a.o CMS from work, so can catch them some of the time. Hopefully all you'll ever see is an email saying "fixed already", Tom On 18/12/14 16:48, Alex Harui wrote: If someone wants to help keep the MD5s up-to-d

[4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 40: Successful

2014-12-19 Thread flex . ci . builds
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #40 - Successful Changes since last build: [bigosmallm] Update RELEASE_NOTES to include link to wiki with information on iOS 7+ and Android 4+ skins For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_releas

Re: [4.14] Using the new iOS7+ and Android4+ skins

2014-12-19 Thread David Harrburger
Hi Om, Thanks for sharing this page. Just one question please : you say the skins are automatically detected at runtime. So I wonder what I have to do if I want to continue to use the original skins at runtime ? Do I have to set the "old" skins manually (with as, css) ? Thanks a lot and I'm

Re: [4.14] release status update

2014-12-19 Thread Mahmoud Ali
Fixed two more issues: FLEX-34693 and FLEX-34695 On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Mahmoud Ali wrote: > > OK, you should be able to assign issues to yourself now. >> > > Thank you Alex. > > I already resolved FLEX-34694 and FLEX-34692, both were reported by Olaf > and were related to FlatSpark. >

AW: [4.14] Problems to get the latest SDK build using the installer

2014-12-19 Thread Krüger , Olaf
It turned out that my original assumption that I don't got the latest build was wrong! The fix that I wanted to test was already there, but it considered the mobile environment only. Cause I'm testing for the desktop it felt for me like the fix was not there. The fix was revised by Om in the mean

AW: AW: [4.14] Skin for ... BusyIndicator3605 cannot be found.

2014-12-19 Thread Krüger , Olaf
> I have checked in a fix. It should be available in the next build. Confirmed! My tests are ok! Many thanks, Olaf [Merry Christmas - Frohe Weihnachten - Feliz Navidad - Joyeux Noel - Vesele Vanoce] Edscha Holding GmbH Sitz der Gesellschaft: Remscheid Register

AW: [4.14] how to use the new FlatSpark theme?

2014-12-19 Thread Krüger , Olaf
>Olaf, thank you for your help on fixing FLEX-34692. I replicated them to >ButtonIconSkin too. >I just committed changes that fix pretty much everything you reported so far. >Thank you so much for testing! Confirmed! My tests are ok! I've seen that you've already implemented and committed 'iconF

[4.14] Using the new iOS7+ and Android4+ skins

2014-12-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I have created a wiki page that discusses the new skins here [1] I have added a link to the same wiki page in the RELEASE_NOTES as well. Thanks, Om [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/7AAIAw