Hi,
I'm sorry, but I am running out of time to be the RM for Installer
3.2. Is there any chance that the targeted fixes for this release will
be landing this week?
Thanks,
EdB
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/17/15, 4:11 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>>
Hi,
To save some confusion it might be best to move the LICENSE.xxx and NOTICE.xxx
files out of the root directory and just leave the final constructed LICENSE
and NOTICE files there. (For a future release obviously).
Justin
+1 Binding
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.14.1/rc1/apache-flex-sdk-4.14.1-src.zip
Java 1.8
OS: Windows 8.1 amd64 6.3
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or a
Hi Chris,
The .pb files are for a PixelBender-related release we did to work around
some build issues, so they do not go in the release.
-Alex
On 3/24/15, 5:18 PM, "Chris Martin" wrote:
>Doing my check on the SDK and I have a question. Checking out NOTICE,
>README, and LICENSE files. Noted t
Doing my check on the SDK and I have a question. Checking out NOTICE, README,
and LICENSE files. Noted that README.pb, LICENSE.pb, and NOTICE.pb are missing
from the release zip. Is that expected? Never noticed before as I was just
checking out the main LICENSE, NOTICE, and README files. T
Hi,
+1 binding
- hashes and signatures correct
- LICENSE and NOTICE fine
- no unexpected binaries in source release
- all source files have Apache headers
- can compile from source
- test with a couple of simple applications and found no major issues
Minor Issues:
- /samples/themes/README.txt c
flex-utilities_installer_release-candidate - Build #17 - Successful
Changes since last build:
No changes
For more information, check the console output at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-utilities_installer_release-candidate/17/.
Flashlog.txt is where the debugger player outputs trace() calls. You need
an mm.cfg file with the right settings to tell the player to write that
file. The internet was a bit confusing about where it stores it on Linux.
Maybe you can make sense of it.
On 3/24/15, 9:46 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote
On 24/03/15 16:21, Alex Harui wrote:
The console output won’t get reflected to the flashlog.txt, but the
results parser is looking in flashlog.txt for output. So maybe
flashlog.txt will stop logging or show some other error.
I don't have a flashlog.txt file anywhere in my home folder or in /
Hi All,
Wondering what kind of security certificates people are using for
desktop and android?
Are people creating self-signed certificates (eg: in FB) or purchasing
'official' ones?
Google app store allows self-signed apps to be published; can i assume
from that, that self-signed is 'secu
The console output won’t get reflected to the flashlog.txt, but the
results parser is looking in flashlog.txt for output. So maybe
flashlog.txt will stop logging or show some other error.
-Alex
On 3/24/15, 8:40 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>On 24/03/15 14:58, Alex Harui wrote:
>> Tom,
>>
>> Thi
On 24/03/15 14:58, Alex Harui wrote:
Tom,
This is definitely that important, but BasicTests doesn’t do bitmap
compares so it shouldn’t be a matter of generating correct pictures if I
understand you correctly. What kind of failure is being reported?
I've rebuilt now and the tests eventually ex
Tom,
This is definitely that important, but BasicTests doesn’t do bitmap
compares so it shouldn’t be a matter of generating correct pictures if I
understand you correctly. What kind of failure is being reported?
-Alex
On 3/24/15, 3:08 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>I can build th
On 3/23/15, 10:53 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>You are probably correct Alex. I have in the test classes property:
>
>public var writingDirection:Array = [ BlockProgression.TB, Direction.LTR
>] ;
>- Initial values.
>
>But I really don't understand how should I fill this array based on
>configuration?
>
+1
Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.14.1/rc1/apache-flex-s
dk-4.14.1-src.zip
Java 1.8
OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
N
d got this error:
>> ___
>> frameworks-rsls:
>> [echo] build.number is 20150324
>> [unzip] Expanding: C:\Users\someUser\Adobe Flash Builder
>> 4.7\FlexSDK4.14.1
>> \apache-flex-sdk-4.14.1-src\frameworks\libs\textLa
bin folder. This, I think, is
> expected. So I went to the README at the section called "Prepare the
> SDK for use with an IDE", which told me to run `ant frameworks-rsls`,
> which I did, and got this error:
> ___
> frameworks-rsls:
cho] build.number is 20150324
[unzip] Expanding: C:\Users\someUser\Adobe Flash Builder 4.7\FlexSDK4.14.1
\apache-flex-sdk-4.14.1-src\frameworks\libs\textLayout.swc into
C:\Users\someUser
\Adobe Flash Builder 4.7\FlexSDK4.14.1\apache-flex-sdk-4.14.1-src\frameworks\
rsls
[java] Error: Could n
+1 (binding)
I can build the SDK, and use if from the (Linux) command line to build
our core web app.
MD5 and sig OK, and the ApproveSDK ant task runs OK (up to the
mustellaresultsparser, which never seems to generate correct pictures on
this Linux box, even from the checkin tests).
The gpg
So in the VOTE thread I saw at least one other person saw that in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.14.1/rc1/README
in the 'Prepare your system' section, it looks like some
funny character encoding:
Flash Player ‘playerglobal.swc’
(Pic @http://files.falkensweb.com/f/e8d087bbb
> The RSL build number is not being expanded in flex-config.xml after running
> ant frameworks-rsls. I thought this had been fixed?
The token is expanded by the various 'prepare the SDK for IDE'
scripts, not the ant target.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
Hi,
Yes, I forgot to mention this in the vote email: I'm using TLF and
BlazeDS from the 4.14.0 release. Since this is a minor update, I
didn't want to confuse the issue by introducing changes in the
dependencies. I have added the appropriate tags to the repos in
question.
EdB
On Tue, Mar 24, 2
22 matches
Mail list logo
