In 0.0.3, we are expecting folks to use SWCs to hold their JS files. The
workflow around that is a bit rough right now, but you can follow the ant
scripts we use for the FlexJS SWCs like Core.swc or HTML.swc.
The compiler should still be copying any files it finds by chasing
goog.require, althoug
On 8/3/15, 7:33 PM, "lizhi" wrote:
>flashdevelop is a good chose of as develop.it is have 30+ 40+ %user.it
>very
>fast,and small,powerful,and customable,opensource,free.i use it,not fb,and
>idea,not just of his free.so,flexjs,must support it.
>i have see the flashdevelop not support the flexjs.
0.0.2,will copy the custom js to bin.
but 0.0.3 not copy that.
and 0.0.2 will copy part closure to js-debug.
but 0.0.3 copy all the closure to js-debug.
not good
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/flexjs0-0-3-sdk-js-lib-not-use-tp48767.ht
flashdevelop is a good chose of as develop.it is have 30+ 40+ %user.it very
fast,and small,powerful,and customable,opensource,free.i use it,not fb,and
idea,not just of his free.so,flexjs,must support it.
i have see the flashdevelop not support the flexjs.but the flexjs can run
with ant.and flashdev
Hi,
> You could just do a "ant release" in the flex-asjs repo. That is your
> release candidate :-)
I tried but it failed, the requirements (as per the READme) include setting up
about 10 things (Flex, Falcon, FalconJX etc etc).
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
this is my output after rebuild step. As the wiki says:
"You should be able to build your project now, click on Build -> Rebuild
project.
(Fix the eventual error the compiler found and use Build -> Make project)"
But I get 18 errors...
Thanks for any clue about how to solve this.
Thanks
Hi Alex,
thanks, installation finally was success with your MD5 update.
2015-08-04 0:51 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> GCL keeps changing their download. Some future nightly will have some
> version of GCL locked in to avoid this hassle in the future. Meanwhile, I
> just updated the MD5 so try aga
GCL keeps changing their download. Some future nightly will have some
version of GCL locked in to avoid this hassle in the future. Meanwhile, I
just updated the MD5 so try again.
-Alex
On 8/3/15, 3:22 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm following Fred's
On 8/3/15, 3:38 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>
>I prefer 2b slightly because the release manager probably tested
>everything
>with GCL from GOOG_HOME. The newly downloaded GCL during ant release
>might
>break something.
Sounds good to me.
Thanks
-Alex
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Can you please make the changes and we can then review it again?
>
> I would need a release candidate in order to review it - as you need to
> know what’s being bundled.
>
You could just do a "ant release" in the flex-asjs repo. T
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 8/3/15, 3:11 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/3/15, 1:28 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala"
> >> wr
Hi,
> Can you please make the changes and we can then review it again?
I would need a release candidate in order to review it - as you need to know
what’s being bundled.
Re GCL being in LICENSE/NOTICE currently what you have goes beyond what is
legally required so it not a blocking issue if i
Hi,
I'm following Fred's wiki tutorial.
First, I understand this only can be tested with a nightly FlexJS SDK, but
as I try to use the installer (3.2.0) to install a flex js nightly, the
installer fails downloading Google Closure and stops in that step.
Installer version 3.2.0 (mac)
Using Locale
On 8/3/15, 3:11 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/15, 1:28 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >One thing I couldn't figure out was should we remove the
Justin,
Can you please make the changes and we can then review it again? It would
be easier that way.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > It is always hard to know what the “right” thing to do is, but note that
> > in [3], sebb recommends listing non-AS
Hi,
> It is always hard to know what the “right” thing to do is, but note that
> in [3], sebb recommends listing non-ASF AL2.0 dependencies in LICENSE.
Which probably doesn’t apply here as it’s a different situation i.e. in that
case the font in question is a binary file whose license wasn’t obv
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 8/3/15, 1:28 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >One thing I couldn't figure out was should we remove the requirement to
> >have a separate GOOG_HOME folder. Or should we get rid of the whole
> >GO
Awesome. Every little bit helps.
-Alex
On 8/3/15, 12:00 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>I took care of the things in the js/bin directory. Executables for externc
>and compcjsc have been added. jsc and jquery now use -js-output-type=jsc.
>I'm now able to build my projects using only what's
Alex,
I took care of the things in the js/bin directory. Executables for externc
and compcjsc have been added. jsc and jquery now use -js-output-type=jsc.
I'm now able to build my projects using only what's in js/bin, so things
should work well from the command line now.
I'm not sure what to chan
OK, so is this about how to use FlexJS 0.0.3 in FlashDevelop?
If you delete FlexJS 0.0.3, then re-install it and don’t touch any other
files in it can you:
Use the command-line and bin/mxmlc to compile examples/DataBindingTest and
run the bin-debug/DataBindingTest.html? That’s the example I know
On 8/3/15, 1:59 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>As the GCL (incorrectly) doesn’t have a NOTICE file there’s no need to
>add it to NOTICE [1] and as it Apache licensed there no need to add it to
>LICENSE [1].
It is always hard to know what the “right” thing to do is, but note that
in [3], s
On 8/3/15, 1:28 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>
>One thing I couldn't figure out was should we remove the requirement to
>have a separate GOOG_HOME folder. Or should we get rid of the whole
>GOOG_HOME thing completely?
Thanks for working on this. IMO, we sho
Hi,
As the GCL (incorrectly) doesn’t have a NOTICE file there’s no need to add it
to NOTICE [1] and as it Apache licensed there no need to add it to LICENSE [1].
However probably best in this case is to assume it had a generic NOTICE and
just add something like this:
"This software contains co
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> On 7/31/15, 4:19 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Justin Mclean
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > Well, given this is Apache, I would first start by double-checking the
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
