On 12/22/15, 2:59 AM, "Mihai Chira" wrote:
>>
>> If the answer
>> is to explicitly list the SWCs, that should be straightforward to do.
>
>I suggest that we try to see what happens if we just include the flex
>version of the swc. My guess is that all the unit tests will
The PR looks good to me. Thanks!
If you want to be thorough, you can open a JIRA ticket with the details of
this enhancement. That will help when we write the Release Notes for 4.15.0
Thanks again for the contribution!
Regards,
Om
On Dec 22, 2015 12:21 PM, "OK" wrote:
GitHub user ok-at-github opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/39
Update to FontAwesome 4.5
Currently the SDK contains version 4.2.
This request contains the updated font itself and the updated
AwesomeUtils.as
You can merge this pull request into a Git
It's done, hope it's ok now ;-)
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/4-15-0-Update-FontAwesome-icon-lib-to-4-5-tp50737p50776.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #139 - Successful
Changes since last build:
No changes
For more information, check the console output at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/139/.
OmPrakash Muppirala wrote
> If you want to be thorough, you can open a JIRA ticket with the details
> of
> this enhancement. That will help when we write the Release Notes for
> 4.15.0
> Thanks again for the contribution!
Done, it's a pleasure to help :-)
Olaf
--
View this message in
> That thread seems to be about Flash Builder compatibility. This is just
> Ant stuff, isn't it?
Yes, but it does detail some of the internal logic, logic which may
explain why we're seeing the as3 version of UIImpersonator, despite
the fact that we're also including the flex version of the swc.
Hi Alex,
The data is few lines of result i am getting when i send print command to
fdb.
My question was that i am currently having data in XMLListCollection. I am
facing issue with updating perticular variable value. Do you think changing
the data type will make things better? I do not have any
Hi,
I was currently updating the builds.apache.org job for BlazeDS and was a little
puzzled by the url the job checks out:
Cloning repository http://git.apache.org/flex-blazeds.git
I know that the ASF Infra guys tend to run scripts on the job config, if they
change something ... for example
Ok so I just chatted with Infra ... git.apache.org is a read-only clone of
git-wip... it seems the sync failed for blazeds and it was out of date. After
Infra triggered a sync, all was back to normal ... but we should keep an open
eye on that ...
Chris
Good to know.
On Dec 22, 2015, at 2:08 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Ok so I just chatted with Infra ... git.apache.org is a read-only clone of
> git-wip... it seems the sync failed for blazeds and it was out of date. After
> Infra triggered a sync, all was back to
Seems there are also problems with flex-utilities ... just opened a jira ...
Anyone know the state of the "splitup" job? shouldn't the maven stuff be moved
to a separate repo?
Chris
Von: Harbs
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Dezember
Hi Dhwani,
I'm still confused about what exact problem you are having. Are you still
having a problem with FDB or just updating a value in an XMLListCollection?
-Alex
On 12/21/15, 11:58 PM, "dhwanishah85" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>The data is few lines of result i am
The develop branch. But after I merged the rc branch into develop.
If you look here [1] you'll see that the rc builds are not enabled.
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net
-Alex
On 12/22/15, 12:29 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Just to double check what branch was
On 12/22/15, 5:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Seems there are also problems with flex-utilities ... just opened a jira
>...
>Anyone know the state of the "splitup" job? shouldn't the maven stuff be
>moved to a separate repo?
The JIRA issue [2] was never closed,
15 matches
Mail list logo