On 5/6/16, 6:56 PM, "lizhi" wrote:
>current the Vector. is a array,it is good.
>
>but can i custom it,use the flexjs0.7,changed it to float32array?
There is no way to do that right now. Seems like a reasonable request
though.
-Alex
current the Vector. is a array,it is good.
but can i custom it,use the flexjs0.7,changed it to float32array?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/can-i-custom-override-some-base-class-Vector-Number-tp52860.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Developm
Hi Alex,
Yeah I have first confirmed and they are willing to share progress on FlexJS
for users.
We are into technology to help people solve issues faster. You helped us and
thus we return it back.
I will signup in JIRA and donate it soon.
Thanks
Dhwani
--
View this message in context:
http:
On 5/6/16, 3:51 PM, "dhwanishah85" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>I would love to donate it.
>May I know how I can attach it on JIRA issue?
>Do I need to subscribe separately over there?
Yes, you will need a JIRA login id and password.
I would imagine you developed this component as part of your job, so
Hi Alex,
I would love to donate it.
May I know how I can attach it on JIRA issue?
Do I need to subscribe separately over there?
Thanks
Dhwani
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-extending-VerticalColumnLayout-tp52676p52856.html
Sent fr
OK, will do. If we did stop having an Ant build someday, what would be
the plan for Maven to leave these files around for IDEs to use?
-Alex
On 5/6/16, 4:01 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well I don't copy the files there anymore, I completely generate new ones,
>Initially I copied them replaci
Well I don't copy the files there anymore, I completely generate new ones,
Initially I copied them replacing things, but now I completeley generate them.
Feel free to do what you want to do with them.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: S
Hi Chris,
I found that the FB projects for the FlexJS SWCs were giving errors
because they were expecting compile-config.xml in src/main/resources. As
I was fixing it up it I realized that copying these files (now named
src/main/config/compile-as-config.xml and compile-js-config.xml to target
is
On 5/6/16, 12:50 PM, "dhwanishah85" wrote:
>So finally we are able to dispatch and handle event in custom
>verticlecolumn
>Component
Congratulations! If you would like to donate your code to the Apache Flex
project, please attach it to a JIRA issue or create a pull request.
Thanks,
-Alex
So finally we are able to dispatch and handle event in custom verticlecolumn
component
Here is how our class look like:
Actionscript code:
public class ResponsiveVerticalColumnLayout extends VerticalColumnLayout
{
protected var _minColumnWidth:int;
protecte
Hi,
I've tuned the Wiki page on FlexJS CreateJS and refined the example even
further so you really get a sense of how you can build CreateJS
application using MXML. In the Wiki page, I've emphasized the benefits of
using ActionScript and MXML over JavaScript, so hopefully that will give
CreateJS d
I think I found the answer. I was thinking that
list1 += list4, which is equivalent to
list1 = list1 + list4
would just use the [[Append]] operation. But that isn't true. Further
down in the spec (in 11.4) it actually addresses Addition operator. And
in there it says:
Lol ... ok ... that solved my problem :-)
I just re-checked my build and I excluded all of the tests that had these
dependencies to externs in the pom.xml of the falcon-jx project. I noticed that
it contained a :
**/TestGoogEmiter.java
And the class is now named TestGoog
On 5/6/16, 8:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Hmmm ... could the Testcase be changed to be self sufficient? The
>problem is that this would create the following chain of dependencies:
>
>Falcon-JX --> Extern GCL --> Falcon
>
>The problem with this is that Flacon and FalconJS are in the compi
On 5/6/16, 3:07 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>3) Do we know of any other Maven-built code bases that use conditional
>compilation and offer slightly different APIs for downstream modules?
>
>I don't know of any, but I do know projects that produce different output
>from the same input ... if y
Hmmm ... could the Testcase be changed to be self sufficient? The problem is
that this would create the following chain of dependencies:
Falcon-JX --> Extern GCL --> Falcon
The problem with this is that Flacon and FalconJS are in the compiler "domain"
and the externs in the "extern" domain an
I just wanted to correct something I miss typed in the mail I was responding to
... as in that I wrote that it's probably related to my changes and I wanted to
correct that.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Mai 2016 17:05:30
An: dev@flex.apac
Just adding some two cents on the other side. We do not use Maven for our
internal production. We have exclusively private intranets for our development
environments that do not have internet access. We have our own build
mechanisms in place internally which function better than kludging
Well I did fix up Flexmojos to work with a manually deployed FlexJS sdk for the
last ApacheCon EU in 2015 ... unfortunately so much has changed, that this is
no longer possible. No matter how hard I try, I don't think it's possible to
create a sensible build for FlexJS with this mixup with the s
On 5/6/16, 7:50 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>...ähm ... so it's probably NOT related to work i did ;-)
Sidebar: You have an interesting way of motivating people to help you.
The sentence above reads: "It can't be my fault so it must be your fault,
so now help me". Whether you made the commit
On 5/6/16, 2:07 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>2016-05-06 9:41 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> which is why I'd rather not spend time right now trying to
>> make Maven build a SWC that our end-user customers won't need.
>>
>
>If I talk as a customer, I would say th
...ähm ... so it's probably NOT related to work i did ;-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Mai 2016 13:24
An: 'dev@flex.apache.org'
Betreff: [Falcon] Failing test in TestGoogEmitter
Hi,
since two or three days I a
Hi,
since two or three days I am having problems with one of the tests in the
compiler suite:
TestGoogEmitter.testSimple
The test report is:
---
Test set: org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.codegen.js.goog.TestGoogEmit
1) Otherwise, why would we need to build a custom Mojo just to do regex string
replacement?
Because regexp replacement was the wrong thing to do from the start. It would
have been good to use a diff patch approach and for that there are already
plugins available and tested. Anyway ... have you
2016-05-06 9:41 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> which is why I'd rather not spend time right now trying to
> make Maven build a SWC that our end-user customers won't need.
>
If I talk as a customer, I would say that my company could never adopt a
technology that it's not maven driven, since all our prod
But, according to how I’m reading the spec, the following should work, but it
doesn’t:
list4 = new XMLList();
list4[0] = ;
list4[1] = ;
list4[2] = ;
list1 += list4 + xml2.z;
On May 6, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Harbs wrote:
> I got rid of just about everything and it still was not working.
>
> I fin
2016-05-06 9:16 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> Why put the entire project on hold? Don't people also want to
> know if we can shim the MX and Spark libraries?
>
> -Alex
>
>
MX and Spark is, for me, the viewable thing that could make people get
interest (all eye candy things has that attraction power
I got rid of just about everything and it still was not working.
I finally replaced list1 += list4 with xml2.a += list4 and that works.
So the following does not work:
list1 = xml2.a;
list1 += list4;
But the following does:
xml2.a += list4
I’m guessing that the reason the second case works is
Hmm.
Did you try commenting out lines of code in your first example until it
looks like this employees example? Maybe one of the lines cause a bug. I
wasn't sure what list1[0][0][0] would be, for example.
Or comment out the node. I just noticed that the append may have
picked up the name() fr
>
>5) Why not use Ant for the things that are hard and Maven for the rest?
>
>This way we have to configure two build systems. And it doesn't make us
>think twice about design decisions. If our first thought doesn't work
>with maven we do it with Ant. Anyway it wouldn't solve the root problem:
>Th
No. That’s not it.
For example, this:
var e =
Joe20
Sue30
;
// append employees 3 and 4 to the end of the employee list
var newE:XMLList = new XMLList();
newE[0] = Fred;
newE[1] = Carol;
e.employee += newE;
trace(e);
outputs:
Joe
20
Sue
30
Fred
On 5/5/16, 11:28 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>2016-05-06 2:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>>
>> I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the
>> "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use
>> Ant for some of
On 5/5/16, 11:38 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>FWIW, I also tried
>list1 += < id=“1”/>;
>instead of
>list1 += list4
>but that did not work either.
>
>I re-read the spec and it does look like you are reading it right, but it
>does not make sense to me and I don’t know how that jives with the
>behavior in
33 matches
Mail list logo
