On 6/4/16, 4:41 PM, "jude" wrote:
>Thanks. Does this path look right, "/Applications/Adobe Flash Builder
>4.7/sdks/FlexJS2/frameworks/projects/Core/src"? BTW FlexJS folder is
>FlexJS2. and tried and it still doesn't find it. I tried cleaning and
>restarting FB to no change. I'm on Mac.
Which v
Thanks. Does this path look right, "/Applications/Adobe Flash Builder
4.7/sdks/FlexJS2/frameworks/projects/Core/src"? BTW FlexJS folder is
FlexJS2. and tried and it still doesn't find it. I tried cleaning and
restarting FB to no change. I'm on Mac.
It's not a big issue since I can access the file
I agree with Carlos. If the framework side of FlexJS is to be successful,
it needs a robust and opinionated "main" set of UI components (even if the
SDK also means to be flexible and support other JS component sets). That
was one of the biggest selling points of the old Flex SDK, and that's what
de
On 6/4/16, 1:06 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>2016-06-03 22:13 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>>
>> I'm interested in what Carlos and others would expect from FlexJS in
>>order
>> to be a "better way" of developing web apps.
>>
>
>I think FlexJS is getting lots of c
Thanks Josh, I have reached out to Chris Campbell on this issue via Twitter.
Hope it helps. Others on this mailinglist please vote for the bug
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3962712
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
> Op 3 jun. 2016 om 16:24 heeft Josh Tynjala het
> volgende gesch
2016-06-03 22:13 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
> I'm interested in what Carlos and others would expect from FlexJS in order
> to be a "better way" of developing web apps.
>
I think FlexJS is getting lots of cool stuff that make it *potentially*
very flexible, but thinking as a user (or
someone that wo
