On 8/19/16, 3:44 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>
>In 0.6.0, we were copying files from the
>'...\downloads\falcon\compiler\generated\dist\sdk\bin' directory. Did
>that
>get moved?
Yes. The Maven refactor
Hi,
For FlexJS:
I can see that mention of OpenFL has been added to LICENSE, however the file in
question [1] has an Apache license header (not MIT as I think it should be).
We’re also not following the terms of it's MIT license [2] to include the
copyright and full text of the license.
I just tried the rc release with the current npm installation setup.
First issue I see is this:
Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, scandir
'C:\Users\omuppirala\AppData\Roaming\npm\node_modules\flexjs\downloads\falcon\compiler\generated\dist\sdk\bin'
In 0.6.0, we were copying files from
Hi,
> I'm not sure what that means, but I believe it has been agreed upon that
> we are supposed to conduct as thorough a review of the nightly builds as
> would be done of the RC
Has any other PMC member reviewed the latest or a recent nightly?
Thanks,
Justin
CI Builds seem to have created something:
flex-falcon (only the apache-flex-falconjx files):
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-falcon%20release%20branch
/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/
flex-asjs:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs_release_branch/lastS
On 8/19/16, 8:50 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Ok so if we are all set and ready, I would start preparing a 1.0.0
>release of burg-types and the build tools plugin and then stage a Maven
>release (candidate) in a staffing repo. As soon as that's done, one of
>you
Ok so if we are all set and ready, I would start preparing a 1.0.0 release of
burg-types and the build tools plugin and then stage a Maven release
(candidate) in a staffing repo. As soon as that's done, one of you could
initiate a normal ant release build.
Are you ok with that?
Chris
Von
I have been using the latest nightlies to work on some projects, and things
look good to me.
- Josh
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 8/19/16, 1:41 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >> Should we wait for more
On 8/19/16, 1:41 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Should we wait for more reviews or create release candidates?
>
>IMO proof is in the eating rather than looking at the menu, time for a RC!
I'm not sure what that means, but I believe it has been agreed upon that
Hi,
> Should we wait for more reviews or create release candidates?
IMO proof is in the eating rather than looking at the menu, time for a RC!
Justin
Release branches have been created. I haven't hooked them up to CI.
Should we wait for more reviews or create release candidates?
-Alex
On 8/18/16, 9:57 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>+1.
>
>I think now would be a good time to cut a release branch.
>
>On Aug 18, 2016, at 6:40 PM,
11 matches
Mail list logo