+1.
Let’s keep things positive and keep things rolling.
Like we’ve discussed in the past, let’s try not to read too much intent into
emails. Email is a bad medium for conveying intent. I didn’t read bad intent
from anyone here.
Thank you Alex for getting this release out, and thank you Justin
OK, pushed it, so the latest FalconJX will need the latest develop branch
of flex-asjs and branches need to be synced.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/14/16, 3:09 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>On 9/14/16, 2:31 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>>Will this effect the CSS file generated?
>
>The JS-side outputs both a .css fil
On 9/14/16, 4:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>Perhaps the question we should be asking is why are other PMC members are
>not finding these issues earlier as well?
Well, I can only speak for myself, but I have learned over the years that,
while we can't say "Community over Policy" since policy
Hi,
> Justin, regardless of the perceived tone of Alex's message, the content of
> it should not be dismissed. You always seem to raise new licensing issues
> at the last minute before a release
Here the issues were raised well before the RC was made so not really last
minute. [1][2]
But it’s t
Justin, regardless of the perceived tone of Alex's message, the content of
it should not be dismissed. You always seem to raise new licensing issues
at the last minute before a release. This timing can be extremely
frustrating for the rest of us.
- Josh
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mcl
Hi,
> I don't think there is a problem. Let's push npm out so we can push out
> the announcement. If there is a problem it can be rectified.
I was suggesting that care be taken. You yourself stated that the npm release
contained code from the nightly. [1]
> This is another example of why the
On 9/14/16, 2:31 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Will this effect the CSS file generated?
The JS-side outputs both a .css file and some data packed onto the
application that is converted into data structures for calls to
ValuesManager (via SimpleCSSValuesImpl). The .css file won't change, it
needs to be st
Hi,
> If that's the case, I guess we'll need to switch to using "npm pack" for
> testing NPM builds in the future. It produces an archive that is the same
> as what gets downloaded when a version is published to NPM's servers, but
> you can use it to install locally.
That sounds like a good idea
Will this effect the CSS file generated? What do you mean by “hacking at
runtime”?
On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:11 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I would like to change the way FalconJX outputs non-standard CSS that is
> used by the ValuesManager in order to make it easier for the MX/Spark port
> to use the
I would like to change the way FalconJX outputs non-standard CSS that is
used by the ValuesManager in order to make it easier for the MX/Spark port
to use the same data. It might actually make parsing the data faster, but
it will mean that it will be trickier to hack the data at runtime, which
was
Mxmlc will generate a subclass of the main class and add hooks that the
index.html will call to start up the app. It will only output JS files it
finds via class dependency analysis.
Compc does not generate any subclasses or index.html. It just compiles
the AS files you asked it to.
So yes, the
yes ihave gen the js file.but it is have diffrent of mxmlc ，so maybe the mxmlc
have some option，can i show you the 2file？help me why diffrent
发自我的iPhone
-- Original --
From: Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Development]
Date: 周三,9月 14,2016 23:12
To: lizhi
Subject: R
On 9/13/16, 3:28 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>The npm flexjs package is a thing on its own which points to only released
>Apache artifacts. We are not publishing unreleased apache code anywhere.
>
>Still not sure what the violation is.
I don't think there i
COMPC is for building libraries. It does not generate an entry point.
MXMLC is for building applications.
So, IMO, you would use COMPC to compile all of your library code and GCC
to generate a single file, then you will have to build your own index.html
and main.js that calls into that single fil
We don't call GCC on the command line, we use the Java APIs. The exact
set of options depend on MXMLC and/or COMPC arguments.
You can see some of the options in the flex-falcon repo in
JSClosureCompilerWrapper.java and MXMLFlexJSPublisher.java. But yes, we
do turn off deprecation warnings.
-Alex
and it is not the have error,build with mxmlc.
it is diff compc and mxmlc?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/flexjs-pack-full-folder-in-a-js-tp55085p55143.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
oh yes,need add --js goog\base.js
but.
SpriteFlexjsMain.js:formatted:656Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property
'prototype' of undefined
indexjsmin.html:11 Uncaught TypeError: SpriteFlexjsMain is not a constructor
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nab
thanks agine.
i have gen the js file success.
but runing get this error
SpriteFlexjsMain.js:5 Uncaught ReferenceError: goog is not defined
indexjsmin.html:11 Uncaught TypeError: SpriteFlexjsMain is not a
constructor.
and i see the js file,not find the goog.
how ememd the goog cdoe
--
View t
18 matches
Mail list logo
