Re: [FlexJS] ASDoc: Any reason for additional config options?

2016-12-20 Thread piotrz
It's about half past 8 AM and I'm in a Zombie Mode, so doing weird and unpredictable things! I hope my code will be ok at half past 1 PM when other guys from my Team will start doing Code Inspections. :D Thanks Chris! Looking forward to the results. :) Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck

Re: [FlexJS] ASDoc: Any reason for additional config options?

2016-12-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Piotr, Yes it will be static html content as we know it from all other API docs for all other languages I have come across. It’s packaged as self-sufficient „{artifactid}-version-javadoc.jar“ files together with the artifact and the artifacts sources in typical Maven style. And how on ear

Re: [FlexJS] ASDoc: Any reason for additional config options?

2016-12-20 Thread piotrz
Hi Chris, What will be the results of your work ? I mean I will get documentation from source code AS and Java and I will see this documentation as code hint ? It will be an html output ? Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex

[FlexJS] ASDoc: Any reason for additional config options?

2016-12-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi, I’m currently workin on Maven support of the ASDoc output. Now I’m sort of wondering, why we need these „doc-namespaces“ and „doc-sources“ config options? Shouldn’t the normal sources and namespaces be enough? Chris

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

2016-12-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, As per this: > Also be aware that I will have extremely limited internet access (no phone, > some access via satellite) from Friday my time (GMT +10) onwards and it’s > unlikely that I'll have the bandwidth to upload any further RCs for several > weeks after that date. Being Wednesday afte

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

2016-12-20 Thread Alex Harui
Apache projects aren't supposed to make forks without permission. Getting permission is a whole process. For me, it was easier to put a copy in the Adobe Flex SourceForge repo and get it from there. That way Adobe is still the distributor. -Alex On 12/20/16, 1:12 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:

[4.16.0] # Apache Flex SDK 4.16.0 nightly build 175: Successful

2016-12-20 Thread flex . ci . builds
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #175 - Successful Changes since last build: No changes For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/175/.

Re: Converting JavaScript libraries to AS3

2016-12-20 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/20/16, 6:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > >I think this is what our „externs“ do ... you sort of generate a no-op AS >counterpart which the IDE is able to use for content assist, but the >FlexJS then directly calls the JS library. >But I bet the others will be able to give you more de

Re: Converting JavaScript libraries to AS3

2016-12-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi, I think this is what our „externs“ do ... you sort of generate a no-op AS counterpart which the IDE is able to use for content assist, but the FlexJS then directly calls the JS library. But I bet the others will be able to give you more detailled infos on this. Chris Am 20.12.16, 15:34 sch

Converting JavaScript libraries to AS3

2016-12-20 Thread flex capacitor
There's a few large libraries out there that are written in JavaScript. I've been working with them and am disappointed it's not AS3 for obvious reasons. Since the community has been working on cross compiling AS3 to JS is there any work on taking a JavaScript library and parsing it into a AS3 clas

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

2016-12-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
As we have been having problems like this quite regularly ... what would prevent us from forking osmf and adding that to our flex extras git repo and publishing osmf to maven-central. Shouldn’t that resolve this type of problem once and for all? Chris Am 19.12.16, 23:27 schrieb "Justin Mclean"