I'm not sure whether seeing some transpiled code for someone is a good
experience.
I would rather explore TourJS and make there examples. Then publish links to
each of them.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.
piotrz wrote
> I would rather explore TourJS and make there examples. Then publish links
> to each of them.
Could you provide me a link to a live demo of TourJS?
Thanks,
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Using-transpiled-HTML-JS
It is not deployed anywhere yet. - That is something which should be done
once we have enough content there.
Link to github [1]
[1] https://github.com/apache/flex-tourjs/tree/develop
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-deve
You could try to build everything with 0.9.0 version and update Maven build
with 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT.
This [1] conversation maybe helpful cause Peter is describing what is the
structure of TourJS.
[1]
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Text-For-the-Tour-td58508.html
Piotr
Hmm, whether TourJS or some other examples, I think we definitely need to get
some examples or live demos online.
FlexJS lives a bit in the dark cause all the useful content is hidden behind
the scene. Difficult to find and maybe also difficult to get it working.
Would be great if we could have th
We need sub domain or domain for TourJS "tourjs.flex.apache.org" or just
http://flex.apache.org/tourjs. I'm not sure how to get it - maybe it is
enough to have in svn repository subfolder and put there build version of
tourjs.
FlexJS MDL Live demo - it was link to build version of MDLExample on Je
Let's say Adobe releases final version of flash player version 35 for
instance, by end of 2019, without further maintenance or development of the
plugin. Will this version continue to stay forever, whether or not users
want to use it or is it that flash player will be blocked by browsers
themselves
I remember reading that browsers won't be supporting after that.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Deepak MS wrote:
> Let's say Adobe releases final version of flash player version 35 for
> instance, by end of 2019, without further maintenance or development of the
> plugin. Will this version con
Browsers are definitely planning to remove all support for the Flash Player
plugin on or before 2020.
- Josh
On Aug 14, 2017 5:19 AM, "Deepak MS" wrote:
Let's say Adobe releases final version of flash player version 35 for
instance, by end of 2019, without further maintenance or development of
For legacy applications or archival purposes, you'll probably want to
keep an installer for the Flash Player and/or older browsers. So they
can be reset up on an old machine, or in a VM. Browsers, for the most
part, have already shut down their plugin APIs.
On 8/14/2017 8:26 AM, Clint M wro
Microsoft, Google and Firefox have all explicitly disabled FP in the
browser and then faced backlash from users and then they reenabled it.
Remember Microsoft's exclusion list? We read tech blogs and have heard the
news but the average user isn't paying attention or they'll be distracted
around 202
It's best to assume that Adobe is no longer going to provide security
updates for Flash Player in 2020. Do not fork any web browsers to try to
continue supporting Flash Player or other plugins. You will put the
security of your users at great risk. It's not worth it.
The age of browser plugins, an
I agree w/ Josh's fear of security problems coming from Flash.
I wonder if a different sandboxing model for plugins would prevent
security issues?
However, beyond that I'd encourage the effort. I think it's a neat
idea that sounds like a big challenge and wish you best of luck with that.
That is definitely something which I'm all for - We shouldn't waste our time
on something which is slowly ending.
We have tremendous opportunity with FlexJS and all stuff related around it
to still writing code with pleasure and give customers what they currently
want - JS applications.
I encour
I haven't had time to look into this. Is there an example app that we are
trying to make work?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 8/13/17, 3:05 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just refreshed with develop branch feature/amf branch if anyone would be
>interested in working on AMF support.
>
>Thanks,
>Piotr
>
>
>
>-
Note that we can and have given out Apache Flex wiki edit access to
non-committers.
If the plan is to move this content to Apache someday, it is prudent to
make sure contributors have agreed to that before contributing. Having
this work contributed directly to the Apache Flex wiki implies that
ag
Thanks everyone. For sure, web apps that we have are lined up to be
migrated.
Only reason I asked that question was that we have several other
applications which run as embedded shockwave flash objects within microsoft
powerpoint slides, which are completely offline (excel data is embedded
within
I think Github is a better way to crowd-source documentation than asking
folks to write to a Wiki page.
It enables anyone to start working on documentation and then send a PR.
That said, Olaf, since you are already a committer, you can simply check in
the docs into the flex-asjs git repo and conti
Om,
What do you mean by check in those doc to flexjs source ? Do you mean create
in our FlexJS repo [1] similar wiki tab as it is currently on Olaf's github
?
[1] https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context
Ah, I see that Apache org on Github has disabled wiki pages. Sorry for the
noise :-(
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:17 AM, piotrz wrote:
> Om,
>
> What do you mean by check in those doc to flexjs source ? Do you mean
> create
> in our FlexJS repo [1] similar wiki tab as it is currently
The problem roots in Adobe's determination, the web without Flash is not
that bad really, mobile is supporting 4k, Adobe lost its unique single
chance without even a try, I am moving on to JavaFx+Gluon,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Deepak MS wrote:
> Thanks everyone. For sure, web apps that
Once we fill enough content we will figure out how to put into the Apache.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Docs-Started-with-some-docs-using-a-github-repo-tp63786p63890.html
Sent
really unfortunate really, were still using flash player for our local apps
in our company, now we have to migrate this to another language and we have
around 2 years to do this. i mean if they still allow flashplayer even
without updates would be great
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Gary Yang
Bonjour,
En congés jusqu'au 4 septembre, je prendrais connaissance de votre message à
mon retour.
Cordialement,
Vincent/AFTER24
24 matches
Mail list logo
