HI,
>> True but how many dates do you need to parse in a second? Plus I was keeping
>> to existing code style.
> Not sure. Like I said, it is optional
Raise it as a minor JIRA and I'll eventually get to it.
> , and I forgot to say thanks for plowing through all of this broken date
> stuff.
Rath
On 4/22/13 8:26 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This many checks in an if statement usually runs faster if you do a simple
>> lookup.
> True but how many dates do you need to parse in a second? Plus I was keeping
> to existing code style.
Not sure. Like I said, it is optional, and I fo
Hi,
> This many checks in an if statement usually runs faster if you do a simple
> lookup.
True but how many dates do you need to parse in a second? Plus I was keeping to
existing code style.
I not measured how long parseDateString takes but I assume it;s only a few ms
if that.
Justin
Bonus optimization if you have time for this pattern:
> +if (!("0" <= letter && letter <= "9" ||
> + letter == "/" || letter == ":" ||
> + letter == "+" || letter == "-" ||
> + letter == "." || letter == " "))
This many checks in an if
