Hi Steffi,
On 4/23/14 6:42 AM, "Steffi" wrote:
>Hi Erik,
>
>
>Swcs:
>the FlexJS SDK contains several swcs. For the test project I use the
>following swcs:
>
> playerglobal.swc
> Halo.swc
> FlexJSJX.swc
> FlexJSUI.swc
> MXMLCClasses.swc
>
Halo.swc should not be use by FlexJS applications, b
Hi Erik,
Swcs:
the FlexJS SDK contains several swcs. For the test project I use the
following swcs:
playerglobal.swc
Halo.swc
FlexJSJX.swc
FlexJSUI.swc
MXMLCClasses.swc
Do you think this could be the default set for any FlexJS project.
At FDT we plan to add a new project type for Flex
I think I have resolved FLEX-34224.
EdB
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Steffi wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> I have added two tickets. Please take a look:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34224
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34225
>
> And I can confrim I am working on FDT.
>
Hi Alex, Hi Eric,
thank you for testing the -marmotinni option.
I would vote for the -output option. It is more intuitive.
I wrote a ticket as OmPrakash Muppirala suggested:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34224
I also added a critical bug report. Please take a look:
https://issues.ap
Hi Om,
I have added two tickets. Please take a look:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34224
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34225
And I can confrim I am working on FDT.
Regards,
Steffi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.co
On Apr 14, 2014 10:41 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> OK, I commented on that issue. I'm not quite sure what they want.
>
Much appreciated! I hope the conversation you started should get things
moving.
Thanks,
Om
> -Alex
>
> On 4/14/14 11:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2
OK, I commented on that issue. I'm not quite sure what they want.
-Alex
On 4/14/14 11:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>wrote:
>
>> Alex,
>>
>> One of the requests I got from FlashDevelop folks was a doc on IDE
>> integration details fo
Erik,
I wasn't sure why there isn't already an -output option for FlexJS. I had
trouble with the -marmotinni option when I was doing the functional tests.
It might have gotten dusty from lack of attention over the months.
If you don't have any objection to having an -output option, one of us ca
I put in a param a while ago (used for testing) called '-marmotinni'; if
you specify that with a file location following, FalconJX should output the
JS to that directory instead of the default location...
I've not tried this directly from the command line, only from the test
platform's ant file, s
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Alex,
>
> One of the requests I got from FlashDevelop folks was a doc on IDE
> integration details for FlexJS. Would it be possible for you to put
> something like that together?
>
> Here is the ticket on FlashDevelop integration.
>
>
Alex,
One of the requests I got from FlashDevelop folks was a doc on IDE
integration details for FlexJS. Would it be possible for you to put
something like that together?
Here is the ticket on FlashDevelop integration.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:12 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
>
Steffi,
We really appreciate the feedback. Just to confirm, this is on FDT, right?
Would be great if you filed a JIRA ticket for your request here [1]
Thanks,
Om
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Steffi wrote:
> Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
>
> I h
Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
I have tested a bit the the RC1.
I was able to compile the DataBindingTest Example.
by only adding the extra parameter "-js-output-type=FlexJS"
This looks good so far.
On the other hand I am a bit concerned about the output location.
I think users wish to set the output
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yup, forgot to commit it. Should be there now.
>
>
Looks good! I have notified the IntelliJ, FDT and FlashDevelop teams.
Hopefully they will participate in this RC testing.
Thanks,
Om
> On 4/10/14 3:19 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>
Yup, forgot to commit it. Should be there now.
On 4/10/14 3:19 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I don't see FlexJS 0.0.1 as one of the options when I open the Installer
>3.0 RC7. Can you please add it so that we can invite the IDE folks to try
>it?
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at
On 4/10/14 3:07 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>
>> >Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB
>>4.7?
>> Yes. I found out that FB is actually using a
I don't see FlexJS 0.0.1 as one of the options when I open the Installer
3.0 RC7. Can you please add it so that we can invite the IDE folks to try
it?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:09 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 4/10
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 4/10/14 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >> BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
> >> FDT), it might be time to contact them again. En
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB 4.7?
> Yes. I found out that FB is actually using a 4.x number in the
> tag in the descriptor and doesn't try to p
On 4/10/14 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
>> FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
>> packaging of FlexJS that it has a bette
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
> FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
> packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it should
> be easier to react to
On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB 4.7?
Yes. I found out that FB is actually using a 4.x number in the
tag in the descriptor and doesn't try to parse the version in the
"description".
-Alex
BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it should
be easier to react to assumptions they are making.
On 4/10/14 2:43 PM, "Alex Harui
Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB 4.7?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Please place all discussion in this thread.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
Please place all discussion in this thread.
Thanks,
-Alex
25 matches
Mail list logo
