Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Hi, > Öhm ... are we sure we can release an RC1 ... as I recall this has never > happened before ;-) Quite rare that’s for sure. > I would have to build and I still get nightmares when it comes to that (or > have things significantly changed here?) IMO it’s still hard to compile. You could

AW: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

. Von: Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> Gesendet: Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 05:12 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1 Hi, Anyone have any further feedback on RC1 before I we officially make it a r

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Hi, Anyone have any further feedback on RC1 before I we officially make it a release? Thanks, Justin

Re: [Non-DoD Source] [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 1/7/16, 12:56 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > >> > >> I recall this seeing something similar before (previous version) and I > >>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Hi, > I'll be able to vote on it tonight, one of dev boxes is down for the count. > Has anything change since I looked at the 4.15 nightly? There would of been couple of minor changes. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Non-DoD Source] [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Hi, > As I mentioned in the VOTE thread, the build is successful. > But when I ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build > successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but > Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK' and >

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

y? > > -Mark > > -Original Message- > From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 12:54 AM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release > candidate 1 > >

Re: [Non-DoD Source] [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

On 1/7/16, 12:56 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >> >> I recall this seeing something similar before (previous version) and I >> think the issue was that the using an OS X made SDK on Windows. The >>scripts >>

Re: [Non-DoD Source] [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Hi, > How would I check and confirm if this is indeed the casel? You’ll have bin/adl.exe and bin/adt.exe rather than bin/adl and bin/adt. At a guess try: ant thirdparty-clean ant -f installer.xml air-download And see which of the air download targets it runs. (air-setup-win or air-setup-mac)

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Oops sorry, it's a translation mistake... It's OK for me ;) On 05/01/2016 23:58, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769 pretends to be fixed in 4.15 but doesn't appear

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Hi, Do any PMC members have time to look and vote on this release candidate? Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769 pretends to be fixed in 4.15 but doesn't appear in the RELEASE_NOTES of the rc1... Is this fix really in the future 4.15 release ? Thanks, Maxime On 04/01/2016 22:13, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Please place discussion here and not in the

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Hi, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769 pretends to be fixed in 4.15 > but doesn't appear in the RELEASE_NOTES of the rc1... > Is this fix really in the future 4.15 release ? Yes this fix is in the 4.15 release and is missing from the RELEASE_NOTES. Why do you say “pretends to

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769 pretends to be fixed > in 4.15 but doesn't appear in the RELEASE_NOTES of the rc1... > > Is this fix really in the future 4.15 release ? > > Yes this fix is