Yes, as I understand it, it does. So it would really be inverse of
what we're doing. We're stubbing the JS to 'fit' AS. Frank suggests we
stub AS to 'fit' the HTML/DOM etc. In his approach the only language
anyone - component and application developers alike - would have to
write in would be AS.
B
Interesting. But that would require a SWC that stubs the browser APIs?
On 12/16/13 6:27 AM, "Frank Wienberg" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>sorry for the late response.
>I didn't mean to use the same code base for the SWF and the HTML
>components, but only the same programming language: ActionScript!
>Of
Hi Alex,
sorry for the late response.
I didn't mean to use the same code base for the SWF and the HTML
components, but only the same programming language: ActionScript!
Of course you would still have to learn different low-level APIs
(DisplayList versus browser DOM/BOM), but at least you could use
The implementation of some low-level components will be vastly different
for SWF than for JS. I'm not clear how you could generate the JS from the
AS version.
-Alex
On 12/10/13 12:13 AM, "Frank Wienberg" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>great to hear of this new approach!
>I never understood why you guys implem
Hi,
great to hear of this new approach!
I never understood why you guys implement Flex components for HTML5 in JS,
not in ActionScript. Once you have AS3 API "stubs" of the browser APIs
(DOM, BOM, remember my suggestions about a [Native] annotation some time
ago?), you would not be limited to buil
Hi,
I've extended the Wiki page for creating components on the FlexJS Wiki
pages. I've also placed the sample code I used, called "DataGridXcompile",
in the FlexJS examples directory.
Peter Ent
Adobe Systems
On 12/6/13 1:14 PM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>I will update the wiki.
>Thanks.
>--peter
>
>O
