Peter,
I think we should have SWF version. This framework has two faces, so it
would be nice to show that both looks same.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Tour-de-FlexJS
you think there is any reason to have a SWF version or should it just
>be JS?
>
>Regards,
>Peter
>
>On 1/11/17, 6:03 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
>wrote:
>
>>+1
>>
>>-Mark
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Peter Ent [mail
ilto:p...@adobe.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:33 PM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS
>
>Hi,
>
>Regarding the notation of a "Tour de FlexJS" in the spirit of the "Tour
>de Flex", I thought I might s
is really great. i am porting AMFJS in FlexJS and half part done and
> now
> figuring the class mapping part.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Tour-de-FlexJS-tp58119p58160.html
> Sent from the Apache
This is really great. i am porting AMFJS in FlexJS and half part done and now
figuring the class mapping part.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Tour-de-FlexJS-tp58119p58160.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list
2017-01-10 21:07 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
> This might be a good first place to implement non-unloadable modules.
> Each "example" could be a module.
>
>
Without doubt, I was think as well use modules in MDLExample, but this is a
great place as well :)
Thanks
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
> [1] http:/
+1
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Peter Ent [mailto:p...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:33 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS
Hi,
Regarding the notation of a "Tour de FlexJS" in the spirit of the "Tour de
Flex"
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/10/17, 11:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >> Let me know what you think. Alex has suggested using the ASDoc example
> >>as
> >> the starting point.
> >>
> >>
> >I think the MDLExample woul
On 1/10/17, 11:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>
>> Let me know what you think. Alex has suggested using the ASDoc example
>>as
>> the starting point.
>>
>>
>I think the MDLExample would be a good scaffolding website. The ASDoc
>example, fontawesome example,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a lot of material now
>
Yes indeed :-)
> Perhaps the repo could be "flex-tourjs" or something similar. I think
> keeping the project separate from the FlexJS SDK would allow it to be
> released on its own schedule and not ti
Hi Peter,
Great! +1 for new repository and your proposed name.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Tour-de-FlexJS-tp58119p58125.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing
Hi,
Regarding the notation of a "Tour de FlexJS" in the spirit of the "Tour de
Flex", I thought I might start a repository to hold it. We have a lot of
material now and people could begin contributing to it.
Perhaps the repo could be "flex-tourjs" or something similar. I think keeping
the proj
12 matches
Mail list logo
