Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-08 Thread Erik de Bruin
+1 (binding) Sorry I couldn't help with this release. EdB On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Om wrote: > Hi, > > This is the second official release of the Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR > application. This version has been tested with *Apache Flex 4.9.0*. This > version also allows users to cu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-08 Thread Nick Tsitlakidis
Same for me, I had the RC2 installed and during the setup I was asked if I want to upgrade it. The same happened with the RC1->RC2 installation. On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > I was able to upgrade one of my machines from 1.0.9 to 2.0.2 with no > issues. > > -Nick

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-08 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
I was able to upgrade one of my machines from 1.0.9 to 2.0.2 with no issues. -Nick On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > In fact, when the app is released to production, existing apps will be > > prompted for an auto-update. > > I can confirm this when I run the 2.0.2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > In fact, when the app is released to production, existing apps will be > prompted for an auto-update. I can confirm this when I run the 2.0.2 installer it asked did I want to upgrade from 2.0.1. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Avi Kessner
My bad. +1 then. On Jan 8, 2013 8:44 AM, "Om" wrote: > On Jan 7, 2013 10:10 PM, "Avi Kessner" wrote: > > > > -1 may I suggest changing the error message to indicate that you should > > first uninstall the old version? > > Is there a way to make it so one can update without uninstalling first? >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Om
On Jan 7, 2013 10:10 PM, "Avi Kessner" wrote: > > -1 may I suggest changing the error message to indicate that you should > first uninstall the old version? > Is there a way to make it so one can update without uninstalling first? > Seems like an unnecessary step and one that might reduce upgrades

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Avi Kessner
-1 may I suggest changing the error message to indicate that you should first uninstall the old version? Is there a way to make it so one can update without uninstalling first? Seems like an unnecessary step and one that might reduce upgrades. On Jan 8, 2013 3:58 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
+1 (binding) Seems to work just fine. One note, however -- when the app is uncompromising the Apache and the AIR ZIP files, the UI freezes for a significant amount of time. I did not see the UI update for the "uncompromising" stage for either file (it just skipped right from comparing MD5 to dow

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Cyrill Zadra
+1 .. installed sucessfully Apache Flex 4.9.0 with the new installer and could compile and run my project. Great work. Thanks. On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Om wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> Tested Mac version. >> >> Minor issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Om
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > Tested Mac version. > > Minor issues - for next release?: > - Install progress popup window changes height during steps - make initial > size big enough for two lines of text? > - License check boxes are still red/gree

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) Tested Mac version. Minor issues - for next release?: - Install progress popup window changes height during steps - make initial size big enough for two lines of text? - License check boxes are still red/green and it's not immediately obvious what a user should do. IMO need to

Re: Download errors (Was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3)

2013-01-07 Thread Alex Harui
e: > >> @Alex, >> >> confirmed, the installer works just fine the second time. >> >> I have added the sdk to flash builder 4.7x64 and it seems good. I will >> try a simple project tonight... >> >>> From: cfram...@adobe.com >>> To

Download errors (Was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3)

2013-01-07 Thread Om
a simple project tonight... > > > From: cfram...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:46:08 -0800 > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3 > > > > +1 > > > > Carol > > >

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread David Coleman
OTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3 > > +1 > > Carol >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Carol Frampton
+1 Carol

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/7/13 8:56 AM, "David Coleman" wrote: > This version is the only version installed on my system. I have a fresh > install of Flash Builder 4.7 64 bit with no apache flex sdk installed or > registered. Om's reply was to someone else. > > should I just uninstall and try again? Just try run

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread David Coleman
This version is the only version installed on my system. I have a fresh install of Flash Builder 4.7 64 bit with no apache flex sdk installed or registered. should I just uninstall and try again? > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:51:16 -0800 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Ins

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Om
When you build it from source, a temp certificate is created and used. You probably had the official version already installed, which is signed by using a unique certificate. Thanks, Om On Jan 7, 2013 8:16 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote: > +1 Mac version now works. I didn't see where in the README it sa

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread David Coleman
orted > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:27:04 -0500 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3 > From: nicho...@spoon.as > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Are we using the same certificate to build these? If so, it shouldn't be a > problem... > > -Nick

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Are we using the same certificate to build these? If so, it shouldn't be a problem... -Nick On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Campos wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Peter Ent wrote: > > > I didn't see where in the README it says to > > uninstall the previous version. I guess

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Jonathan Campos
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Peter Ent wrote: > I didn't see where in the README it says to > uninstall the previous version. I guess that's common sense > It would be good if some people don't try to clean out everything between builds. That is just something I do to keep everything "clean"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Peter Ent
+1 Mac version now works. I didn't see where in the README it says to uninstall the previous version. I guess that's common sense. Peter Ent On 1/7/13 10:46 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >When this error pops up, it's usually a matter of first uninstalling >an existing version, then re-installing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Jonathan Campos
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Christophe Herreman < christophe.herre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Installation went fine. installation worked for me. +1 (binding) Though I usually start by cleaning everything so I wouldn't see the cert issue that is being brought up. -- Jonathan Campos

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
that sounds like the certificates don't match. Did you uninstall the older version before testing it? -Nick On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Peter Ent wrote: > -1 > > This builds for me but does not work. Probably my fault, but the error, > "This application cannot be installed because this in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Erik de Bruin
When this error pops up, it's usually a matter of first uninstalling an existing version, then re-installing the Installer... ;-) EdB On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Peter Ent wrote: > -1 > > This builds for me but does not work. Probably my fault, but the error, > "This application cannot be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Peter Ent
-1 This builds for me but does not work. Probably my fault, but the error, "This application cannot be installed because this installer has been mis-configured. Please contact the application author for assistance." isn't helpful. I'd like to know what was misconfigured so I could correct it. It i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Igor Costa
+1 (binding) Igor Costa www.igorcosta.com www.igorcosta.org On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Roland Zwaga wrote: > turns out my FledxUnit project compilation error was a fluke. Everything > works fine. > > So +1 (non-binding) from me too. > > On 7 January 2013 15:52,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Roland Zwaga
turns out my FledxUnit project compilation error was a fluke. Everything works fine. So +1 (non-binding) from me too. On 7 January 2013 15:52, Christophe Herreman wrote: > Installation went fine. > > +1 (binding) > > - Christophe > > > 2013/1/7 Nick Tsitlakidis > > > I've just tried it as well.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Christophe Herreman
Installation went fine. +1 (binding) - Christophe 2013/1/7 Nick Tsitlakidis > I've just tried it as well. Looks great so +1 (non-binding) from me as > well. > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -NOTICE, LICENSE, README, RELEASE_NOTES look ok > > -Rat repor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-07 Thread Nick Tsitlakidis
I've just tried it as well. Looks great so +1 (non-binding) from me as well. On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > +1 > > -NOTICE, LICENSE, README, RELEASE_NOTES look ok > -Rat report looks ok > -MD5 and ASC checksums match > -src from tar.gz built and ran on Mac OSX > -src from z

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-06 Thread Alex Harui
+1 -NOTICE, LICENSE, README, RELEASE_NOTES look ok -Rat report looks ok -MD5 and ASC checksums match -src from tar.gz built and ran on Mac OSX -src from zip built and ran on Windows -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-06 Thread Roland Zwaga
Hey, the Apache Flex Installer ran without problems for me. The only issue I'm getting has probably nothing to do with the installer, but I'm not sure. Anyways: When I switch to the 4.9.0 SDK I get the following error in one of my unit test projects: Unable to resolve resource bundle "FlexUnitTes

[VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC3

2013-01-06 Thread Om
Hi, This is the second official release of the Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application. This version has been tested with *Apache Flex 4.9.0*. This version also allows users to customize the Flash Player and AIR versions to be downloaded. The official Apache distribution is the source kit whi