Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0

-1 Binding See details in the [DISCUSS] thread. Thanks, Om On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, +1 binding - packages name etc good - LICENSE needs to be double checked by someone else but at the moment I can't seen anything that need to

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0

Hi, -1 Binding Which issues do you think are actual blockers? Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, -1 Binding Which issues do you think are actual blockers? 1, 2 and 5. Thanks, Om Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0

-1 just because the final license wasn't in the kit and we need to figure out the dictionary dependencies. Otherwise, good enough for a 1.0. Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.0/rc0/apache-flex-sq uiggly-1.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5 Source kit

[VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0

Hi, This is a Squiggly Release Candidate 0. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README. As this is the first release please check it carefully as there are likely to be some issues. The release candidate can be found here; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.0/rc0/

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0

Hi, +1 binding - packages name etc good - LICENSE needs to be double checked by someone else but at the moment I can't seen anything that need to be added to the standard boillerplate - NOTICE good - README and RELEASE_NOTE fine - source package contains no binary files - all source files have