[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13641032#comment-13641032
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33497:
--
Reopened FLEX-26508
> Provi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13641078#comment-13641078
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33497:
--
480 is likely to be the next dpi (i.e. XXHIGH
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13641267#comment-13641267
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33497:
--
Added a new branch called "480dpi" and change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13641421#comment-13641421
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33497:
--
Added application mustella test.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Justin Mclean (JIRA) wrote:
> 480 is likely to be the next dpi (i.e. XXHIGH density in android)
Is there any reason to create 400 and also 480?
That way everything is 80px difference.
160, 240, 320, 400, 480? May seem like overkill but this will make
the multip
HI,
Don't think so. Xhigh density on the Android is defined as around 320 but
includes up to 400, there are phones with higher than 400 dpi that use the 320
dpi (I think).
Think of it in the of doubling
320 dpi is 2x 160 dpi
480 dpi is 2x 240 dpi
400dpi is a bit awkward as there no clean multi
Hi,
> Is there any reason to create 400 and also 480?
I should of added but if you feel a 400dpi is needed and want to create a
400dpi target go ahead. You can see the changes required from what I've just
checked in. It's a little tedious to add. Lots of copy paste edit. :-)
Thanks.
Justin
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> 400dpi is a bit awkward as there no clean multiplier form existing dpis.
I'm okay with that reasoning. Just had to pose the question.
--
Jonathan Campos
Hi,
>> 400dpi is a bit awkward as there no clean multiplier form existing dpis.
> I'm okay with that reasoning. Just had to pose the question.
No problem - it still might be useful I'm not 100% sure. It's a little more
more work than 480dpi.
Justin
