Re: AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

2016-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
On 9/15/16, 10:13 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > >I would leave it up to the Release Manager to make the call on a case by >case basis, whether to hold the release or to punt it to the next release. I agree

Re: AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

2016-09-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Sep 15, 2016 8:31 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 9/15/16, 12:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: > > >Just to add my 50ct to this discussion. > > > > > >Justin did bring up the issue. He even brought it when we were first > >discussing starting a

Re: AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

2016-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
On 9/15/16, 12:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Just to add my 50ct to this discussion. > > >Justin did bring up the issue. He even brought it when we were first >discussing starting a release. The discussion sort of dried out without a >resolution, then when it came

AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

2016-09-15 Thread Christofer Dutz
I still have one discussion in mind with the replacing of License Headers in files as part of the Patch process. I guess this isn't resolved yet. I responded more general as the other responses seemed to refer to someone continuously doing something :-) Chris

AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

2016-09-15 Thread Christofer Dutz
Just to add my 50ct to this discussion. Justin did bring up the issue. He even brought it when we were first discussing starting a release. The discussion sort of dried out without a resolution, then when it came to the release, he mentioned it again. But again no action was taken. So I too