e advanced-telemetry.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 3. November 2014 19:00
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [FALCON] Bindable interfaces?
On 11/3/14, 9:51 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
&g
On 11/3/14, 9:51 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well I don't have any objections to leaving it in ... I just noticed that
>it definitely needs some hardening against NPEs.
Feel free to help add more NPE handling. I just haven’t hit those
scenarios otherwise I would have added some handling mys
is changed in a way that that it
doesn't produce NPEs for Bindable interfaces.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 3. November 2014 18:15
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [FALCON] Bindable interfaces?
On 11/2/14, 11:15 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>M testcase consists of a bindable interface, a bindable class that
>implements this and has one property as well as an Application, that uses
>an instance of the class to write the content of a TextField into the
>bindable variable and a label to
I am still
assuming that particuar code is obsolete.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 3. November 2014 06:29
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FALCON] Bindable interfaces?
I’m going to try to consolidate your last set
I’m going to try to consolidate your last set of emails into this post.
On 11/2/14, 12:45 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Even if I could not 100% confirm the code was doing the same as compared
>to the default compiler. I could confirm that removing the code I was
>thinking of being redundant did
Von: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. November 2014 20:42
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [FALCON] Bindable interfaces?
Ok so I did a little more tweaking.
I had to increase the visibility of two SWFDump methods in order to use
SWFDumps output programat
th the same path, which
makes things a lot easier.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. November 2014 14:15
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [FALCON] Bindable interfaces?
Ok ... so I found out what th
2014 13:49
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [FALCON] Bindable interfaces?
Every function call in the default compiler results in these two lines of code:
0 getlocal0
1 pushscope
these are missing in Falcon compiled code.
Another change I found was that in Falco
scope_depth 0
// max_scope0
// code_length 1
bb0
succs=[]
0 returnvoid
}
}
Really need to create a tool for this ... :)
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. November 2014 11:46
An:
Last night I found out that I could simply let the falcon SWFdump dump the swf
of the default compiler any I actually got results I could compare.
One thing that sprung my eyes immediately was that with the old compiler the
first two commands of every method I could find were identical and were
11 matches
Mail list logo
