. The
clients are really happy with what they have too, and they don’t see any need
to change tech.
Thanks for all the work you guys put in
glenn
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:teotigraphix...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 May 2015 14:46
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: F
rise up and replace the BURM by creating a SWF
> backend for FalconJX. Honestly, I think it could perform even better than
> the BURM for the level of optimizations that are currently done by MXMLC.
>
> -Alex
>
> >
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
>
X. Honestly, I think it could perform even better than
the BURM for the level of optimizations that are currently done by MXMLC.
-Alex
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:teotigraphix...@gmail.com]
>Sent: 12 May 2015 13:28
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
Thanks for the info
:-) if only adobe had given it just one more year ay
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:teotigraphix...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 May 2015 13:28
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Falcon progress for as flex sdk
I haven't been around for about 2
I haven't been around for about 2 years, just started checking the commits
and things. It seems there really hasn't been any work on the SWF Falcon
compiler since about the time Gordon stopped committing changes to MXML.
I remember I spent a lot of time studying the code, most all classes I
studie
Hi folks
Just trying to catch up on what's been happening over the past few months
here
Has there been any progress on Flacon when it comes to standard flex
projects?
Just wanted an update on where we stand right now
Thanks for every ones hard work here
Cheers
glenn
pile-config.xml'.
>
> - Gordon
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:25 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Falcon progress
>
> Interesting... On my end only 'sparkSWC' fail
t: Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:25 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Falcon progress
Interesting... On my end only 'sparkSWC' fails. The other tests all pass as
configured (i.e. with -ignore-problems set to cause the tests not to fail on
warnings). I've added @Ignore on &
Interesting... On my end only 'sparkSWC' fails. The other tests all
pass as configured (i.e. with -ignore-problems set to cause the tests
not to fail on warnings). I've added @Ignore on 'sparkSWC' as I agree
all committed tests should either pass or be ignored.
What failures are you seeing on the
On 9/24/13 2:37 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>
>Has anybody gotten a complete app to compile with Falcon yet? Does it run
>correctly?
I am working with a production Adobe application code base. It compiled
and generated a 20MB uncompressed SWF but it still doesn't run. Hopefully
soon...
I see now that the workaround I mentioned was marked with FIXME in the source
code, so that makes it trackable.
- Gordon
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:38 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Falcon progress
Congratulations on getting more SWCs to compile with Falcon! It
Congratulations on getting more SWCs to compile with Falcon! It looks like only
the following 6 tests in SDKSWCTests still have problems:
authoringsupportSWC()
automation_flashflexkitSWC()
chartsSWC()
mxSWC()
sparkSWC()
textLayoutSWC()
Is there a reason why the @Ignore was removed from these fai
; From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:33 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Falcon progress
>
> Fixed a missing newline that made the generate code hard to understand...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Smith [m
Something's screwy. After fixing and resending it still looks bad. The final
instruction is "setproperty p".
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:33 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: Falcon pr
Fixed a missing newline that made the generate code hard to understand...
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:28 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Falcon progress
Today I added MXML parser unit tests for
Today I added MXML parser unit tests for MXMLPropertySpecifierNode in the case
of properties of type Boolean, int, uint, Number, and String.
Here's some background about property-specifier nodes in Falcon:
Suppose a class has a property p of type int. Then you set can p on an instance
(or a cla
16 matches
Mail list logo
