y
of the other files as well I presume.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 3:17 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to manage flex-utilities git repo
Infra responded rather quickly to the flex-radii8 request. It
ember 02, 2014 3:17 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to manage flex-utilities git repo
Infra responded rather quickly to the flex-radii8 request. It would be
already created but I didn't tell them if it was supposed to be a bare
repo or an import of another repo.
So, I think we sh
ion as a second best.
>
>
>-Mark
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:57 AM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: Re: How to manage flex-utilities git repo
>
>
>
>On 9/2/14 5:31 AM, "Kessler C
Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:57 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to manage flex-utilities git repo
On 9/2/14 5:31 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote:
>+1
>
>I like the idea. I can see Justin's concerns too. Is there a way
On 9/2/14 5:31 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote:
>+1
>
>I like the idea. I can see Justin's concerns too. Is there a way to
>have multiple github repos one with each of the dev-subprojects ?
I've asked for a new repo for radii8. We'll see how quick it is to get
one. If you look at the total s
+1
I like the idea. I can see Justin's concerns too. Is there a way to have
multiple github repos one with each of the dev-subprojects ?
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 11:14 AM
To: 'dev@flex.apache.o
OK, so should I ask Infra for flex-radii8 or do we want to try this idea
on it?
If I understand, I would create a radii8 branch and check the code in
there?
-Alex
On 8/30/14 10:05 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I like it.
>
>On Aug 30, 2014, at 6:13 PM, Christofer Dutz
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> while work
Hi,
One (minor) down side is that work will not show up in git hub default ranch
(develop?) until changes are merged into it. This makes the project look less
active than it is.
Justin
I like it.
On Aug 30, 2014, at 6:13 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while working on Squiggly, FlexPMD and the Mavenizer I too realized that the
> way we are currently doing things here is far from ideal as merging stuff
> back to master is allmost impossible.
>
> How about not having a
+1
The first workable sounding solution.
Thanks Chris!
EdB
On Saturday, August 30, 2014, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while working on Squiggly, FlexPMD and the Mavenizer I too realized that
> the way we are currently doing things here is far from ideal as merging
> stuff back to master
10 matches
Mail list logo
