Hi,
> OK, I'll try to look today.
> What do you think of Flex-34101? Should that get fixed before an RC?
I take a look may not be an easy thing to fix.
Thanks,
Justin
neral public.
-Alex
From: omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 12:06 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: Justin Mclean
Subject: RE: Installer RC status?
On Feb 20, 2014 11:45 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
&
OK, I'll try to look today. What do you think of Flex-34101? Should that get
fixed before an RC?
-Alex
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 12:18 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Installer RC status?
Hi,
> OK, I think
Hi,
> OK, I think the SDK install script is ready. What is your plan about the
> fontswf bug? Do you want to fix it for this RC?
Given it been broken in 4.8, 4.9,4.10 and 4.11 and there's a work around it's
probably not high on the list. Plus both the .sh and .bat need to be fixed.
> Are you
Alex Harui
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:49 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org; Justin Mclean
> Subject: Re: Installer RC status?
>
> Some bugs were found in the sdk install script. I'll be working on it
this evening. So I think rc 2 has to wait until I get it done.
>
&
, and I'll need
someone to cut the Windows version as I don't have my Windows machine with me
this week.
Thanks,
-Alex
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:49 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org; Justin Mclean
Subject: Re: Installer RC sta
Some bugs were found in the sdk install script. I'll be working on it this
evening. So I think rc 2 has to wait until I get it done.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
What's the current installer RC status? The build machines is back up and
