Graphic primitives are more lightweight. Right?
Line is not really a replacement for HRule and VRule, because you need to add
stroke every time you add one. That's at least four lines of mxml to one for
HRule and VRule.
There is nothing wrong with making it a line, and then simply wrapping the
Of course. (That's what I already did…)
My way of thinking is that Flex is about making these things easy so that you
don't need to add these custom classes to every project… :-)
On Feb 27, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Michael A. Labriola wrote:
Graphic primitives are more lightweight. Right?
Line is
Hi,
My way of thinking is that Flex is about making these things easy so that you
don't need to add these custom classes to every project… :-)
Post the code and lets have a look.
Thanks,
Justin
On 2/27/13 8:01 AM, Michael A. Labriola labri...@digitalprimates.net
wrote:
Graphic primitives are more lightweight. Right?
Line is not really a replacement for HRule and VRule, because you need to add
stroke every time you add one. That's at least four lines of mxml to one for
HRule and
Here is a link to the HRule and VRule. While these are the MX versions, they
do have a good picture that shows what it can do under the sections Sizing
HRule and VRule controls
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf69084-7d96.html
-Mark
Yep, but the Spark philosophy might lean away from such intelligence and
styles and head towards skinning.
On 2/27/13 8:56 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J mark.kessler@usmc.mil wrote:
Here is a link to the HRule and VRule. While these are the MX versions, they
do have a good picture that shows
, February 27, 2013 1:53 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: VRule and HRule
So you think there should be a separate H/VRule and H/VRuleSkin?
Is it really necessary to have it fully skinnable?
I was just thinking of allowing to specify an alternate stroke (for gradients,
etc) and allow all
Personally, I don't think that providing any possible
aggregations/specializations of existing components would be an improvement
for the framework.
However, the framework provide a BorderContainer component that does a
similar thing (except for the fact that it is also a container): provide
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
I just tried adding a VRule to my code and I was prompted by FB to use
spark.primitives.Line instead. Have you taken a look at it yet?
Agreed. I think most people just think oh that is a line and don't worry
about it. I know
