Re: Build works locally but fails on travis (Storm compatibility)

2015-06-11 Thread Matthias J. Sax
I see :) Btw: Travis is green now. Marton gave the right hint about inconsistent module renaming while moving the layer to flink-contib. Due to an old cache (thanks for the clearing hint, Fabian) and this bug, the funny error message showed up. After clearing the cache I got a different error mess

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2204) Tez ConnectedComponentsStepITCase fails spuriously on Travis

2015-06-11 Thread Till Rohrmann (JIRA)
Till Rohrmann created FLINK-2204: Summary: Tez ConnectedComponentsStepITCase fails spuriously on Travis Key: FLINK-2204 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2204 Project: Flink I

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2205) Confusing entries in JM Webfrontend Job Configuration section

2015-06-11 Thread Fabian Hueske (JIRA)
Fabian Hueske created FLINK-2205: Summary: Confusing entries in JM Webfrontend Job Configuration section Key: FLINK-2205 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2205 Project: Flink

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2206) JobManager webinterface shows 5 finished jobs at most

2015-06-11 Thread Fabian Hueske (JIRA)
Fabian Hueske created FLINK-2206: Summary: JobManager webinterface shows 5 finished jobs at most Key: FLINK-2206 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2206 Project: Flink Issue Typ

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2207) Online documentation of Table API is out of date

2015-06-11 Thread Till Rohrmann (JIRA)
Till Rohrmann created FLINK-2207: Summary: Online documentation of Table API is out of date Key: FLINK-2207 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2207 Project: Flink Issue Type: Bu

Re: Testing Apache Flink 0.9.0-rc1

2015-06-11 Thread Maximilian Michels
The deadlock in the scheduler is now fixed. Based on the changes that have been push to the release-0.9 branch, I'd like to create a new release candidate later on. I think we have gotten the most critical issues out of the way. Would that be ok for you? On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Fabian Hue

Re: Testing Apache Flink 0.9.0-rc1

2015-06-11 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
Aren't there still some commits at the top of the release document that need to be cherry-picked to the release branch? On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 at 17:13 Maximilian Michels wrote: > The deadlock in the scheduler is now fixed. Based on the changes that have > been push to the release-0.9 branch, I'd l

Re: Testing Apache Flink 0.9.0-rc1

2015-06-11 Thread Maximilian Michels
Yes, we would include those in the new release candidate. On Jun 11, 2015 5:22 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" wrote: > Aren't there still some commits at the top of the release document that > need to be cherry-picked to the release branch? > > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 at 17:13 Maximilian Michels wrote: > >

Re: Testing Apache Flink 0.9.0-rc1

2015-06-11 Thread Fabian Hueske
How about the following issues? 1. The Hbase Hadoop Compat issue, Ufuk is working on 2. The incorrect webinterface counts @Ufuk were you able to reproduce the bug? The deadlock in the scheduler is now fixed. Based on the changes that have been push to the release-0.9 branch, I'd like to create a

built problem - flink 0.9-SNAPSHOT

2015-06-11 Thread Felix Neutatz
Hi, the documentation says: "It [the built of the 0.9 snapshot] works well with OpenJDK 6 and all Java 7 and 8 compilers." But I got the following error: [INFO] --- scala-maven-plugin:3.1.4:compile (scala-compile-first) @ flink-runtime --- [INFO] /share/flink/flink-0.9-SNAPSHOT-wo-Yarn/flink-run

Re: built problem - flink 0.9-SNAPSHOT

2015-06-11 Thread Ufuk Celebi
This is on an IBM PowerPC machine, right? Since this MXBeans are from the com.sun.* namespace, I'm not sure if this can be fixed w/o loading the MX beans depending on the JVM. For your JVM, the classes are located in "com.ibm.lang.management.*" and not "com.sun.management.*". On 12 Jun 2015, a

Re: Testing Apache Flink 0.9.0-rc1

2015-06-11 Thread Ufuk Celebi
On 11 Jun 2015, at 20:04, Fabian Hueske wrote: > How about the following issues? > > 1. The Hbase Hadoop Compat issue, Ufuk is working on I was not able to reproduce this :( I ran HadoopInputFormats against various sources and confirmed the results and everything was fine so far. I think I w

Re: built problem - flink 0.9-SNAPSHOT

2015-06-11 Thread Felix Neutatz
Yes, it is on a IBM PowerPC machine. So we change that in the documentation to all Java 7,8 ( except IBM Java)? 2015-06-12 0:34 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi : > This is on an IBM PowerPC machine, right? > > Since this MXBeans are from the com.sun.* namespace, I'm not sure if this > can be fixed w/o load

Re: built problem - flink 0.9-SNAPSHOT

2015-06-11 Thread Ufuk Celebi
On 12 Jun 2015, at 00:42, Felix Neutatz wrote: > Yes, it is on a IBM PowerPC machine. So we change that in the documentation > to all Java 7,8 ( except IBM Java)? Yes, you can also open an issue to investiage this further.

Re: Testing Apache Flink 0.9.0-rc1

2015-06-11 Thread Fabian Hueske
2. is basically done. I have a patch which updates the counters on page reload but that shouldn't be hard to extend to dynamic updates. 2015-06-12 0:40 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi : > > On 11 Jun 2015, at 20:04, Fabian Hueske wrote: > > > How about the following issues? > > > > 1. The Hbase Hadoop Com

Re: Testing Apache Flink 0.9.0-rc1

2015-06-11 Thread Ufuk Celebi
On 12 Jun 2015, at 00:49, Fabian Hueske wrote: > 2. is basically done. I have a patch which updates the counters on page > reload but that shouldn't be hard to extend to dynamic updates. Very nice! :-) Thanks!

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2208) Built error for IBM Java

2015-06-11 Thread Felix Neutatz (JIRA)
Felix Neutatz created FLINK-2208: Summary: Built error for IBM Java Key: FLINK-2208 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2208 Project: Flink Issue Type: Bug Components:

Re: built problem - flink 0.9-SNAPSHOT

2015-06-11 Thread Felix Neutatz
done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2208 2015-06-12 0:50 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi : > > On 12 Jun 2015, at 00:42, Felix Neutatz wrote: > > > Yes, it is on a IBM PowerPC machine. So we change that in the > documentation > > to all Java 7,8 ( except IBM Java)? > > Yes, you can also open