Are we then also dropping the scala-shell, since it still doesn't work
on 2.12?
On 9/11/2020 2:12 PM, Timo Walther wrote:
Big +1 to drop Scala 2.11
This would mean that we can finally use Java 8 language features that
are integrated with Scala.
Regards,
Timo
On 11.09.20 13:15, Igal Shilman
I would hope we can make scala shell with scala 2.12 before dropping 2.11,
many users are still using scala shell to try out new features of flink,
especially for new users.
Chesnay Schepler 于2020年9月13日周日 下午7:59写道：
> Are we then also dropping the scala-shell, since it still doesn't work
> on 2.
Aljoscha, thanks a lot for the detailed response. Now I have a better
understanding of the initial scope.
To me, there are possibly three different committer behaviors. For the lack
of better names, let's call them
* No/NoopCommitter
* Committer / LocalCommitter (file sink?)
* GlobalCommitter (Ice
Right now, we use UnionState to store the `nextCheckpointId` in the Iceberg
sink use case, because we can't retrieve the checkpointId from
the FunctionInitializationContext during the restore case. But we can move
away from it if the restore context provides the checkpointId.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020
