hmm..then what is it
Chesnay Schepler 于2018年12月14日周五 上午5:07写道：
> ehhfrom what I can tell this is not the case.
>
> On 13.12.2018 22:00, Tzu-Li Chen wrote:
> > Not sure how we arrive here but comments a bit noisy made by ASF GitHub
> Bot
> > are now hidde
Not sure how we arrive here but comments a bit noisy made by ASF GitHub Bot
are now hidden to Work Log. Thank you!
Best,
tison.
Thanks a lot for being the release manager Till! And
thanks for the great work Flink community!
Best,
tison.
vino yang 于2018年11月30日周五 下午8:19写道：
> Thanks Till for your great work, also thanks to the whole community!
>
> Thanks, vino.
>
> Timo Walther 于2018年11月30日周五 下午7:42写道：
>
> > Thanks for
uot;[RESULT] [VOTE].."
>
> Thomas
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:48 PM Tzu-Li Chen wrote:
>
> > Hi Till,
> >
> > Maybe wrongly announce the result in the same thread?
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Till Rohrmann 于2018年11
Hi Till,
Maybe wrongly announce the result in the same thread?
Best,
tison.
Till Rohrmann 于2018年11月30日周五 上午1:28写道：
> I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved the 1.7.0 release.
>
> There are 5 approving votes, 4 of which are binding:
> - Chesnay (binding)
> - Timo (binding)
>
Hi,
Thanks Till for preparing the RC1 for Flink 1.7.0!
I checked a few things, but there seem to be some issues with the release
candidate.
+ Built Flink 1.7.0 from sources and ran all tests(On Darwin Kernel Version
17.7.0
Thu Jun 21 22:53:14 PDT 2018; root:xnu-4570.71.2~1/RELEASE_X86_64).
+
Hi jingchengm
Thanks a lot for your proposal! I find it is a good start point for
internal optimization works and help Flink to be more
user-friendly.
AFAIK, DataStream is the most popular API currently that Flink
users should describe their logic with detailed logic.
>From a more internal view
Hi Tony,
I see the corresponding JIRA[1] and it looks like you don't attach it an
mail list. I would do it for you and wonder if you ask for contributor bit
to assign the JIRA to yourself.
For the topic I give some comments on the JIRA and briefly, I am open if we
can take advantage of current
Hi Fabian,
+1 for your proposal.
For the downside, I think after adding the review process template,
the pull request template would be high level into 3 parts:
1. Greeting and community guiding.
2. User completed template.
3. Reviewer complete template.
If we can visually separate them, i.e.,
> > Best, Fabian
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yaX2b9LNh-6LxrAmE23U3D2cRbocGlGKCYnvJd9lVhk
> > [2] https://flink.apache.org
> > [3] https://github.com/apache/flink-web
> >
> > Am Di., 25. Sep. 2018 um 17:56 Uhr schrieb Tzu-Li Chen <
Hi Sun,
JobManager.scala is component of legacy mode, they would be removed as a
sub task of FLINK-10392[1].
For the evolution from "legacy mode" to FLIP-6 new mode, see also [2]. For
short, the previous JobManager is split mainly into JobMaster and
Dispatcher.
[1]
Hi Ramesh,
Apart from Till recommended, internal classes go with document around the
source code define them,
and for the "practices" part, maybe you can take a look at their tests.
But after all, these are all about Flink dev topics and so unstable to be
used in production codes.
Best,
tison.
+1, sounds good to cut down travis burden.
Best,
tison.
Fabian Hueske 于2018年10月2日周二 下午9:02写道：
> +1
>
> Am Di., 2. Okt. 2018 um 14:50 Uhr schrieb Till Rohrmann <
> trohrm...@apache.org>:
>
> > Great idea Chesnay. +1 for running Hadoop 2.4 in a cron job. This will
> help
> > us to cut down our
@ches...@apache.org OK, I get it.
Best,
tison.
Yun Gao 于2018年10月1日周一 下午5:15写道：
> Thanks a lot ! @Chesnay Schepler@Tzu-Li Chen : )
>
>
> Yours
> Yun Gao
>
> --
> 发件人：Chesnay Schepler
> 发送时间：2018
Hi Gao,
Welcome to Flink community! cc Till and Stephan for you.
Best,
tison.
yungao.gy 于2018年10月1日周一 下午1:42写道：
>
> Hi all,
>
> I want to start contributing to Flink with FLINK-10469. Could someone
> grant me the contributor permission? My Jira ID is gaoyunhaii and my full
> name is Yun Gao.
+1 to drop it.
It seems few people use it. Commits history of an experimental
module sparse often means that there is low interest.
Best,
tison.
远远 于2018年9月29日周六 下午2:16写道：
> +1， it‘s time to drop it
>
> Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) 于2018年9月29日周六
> 下午1:53写道：
>
>> Very agree with to drop it. +1
"suggested reviewers" either, but then
> > what will be the process to ensure that PRs will be looked at?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 6:17 AM Tzu-Li Chen
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Fabian,
> >>
>
IMO
> chances that those get the right attention decrease with the number of
> requests.
>
> Best, Fabian
>
>
>
>
> Am Di., 25. Sep. 2018 um 04:10 Uhr schrieb Tzu-Li Chen <
> wander4...@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > Thanks for start the discussion Stephan!
>
Thanks for start the discussion Stephan!
(1) Do we agree on the five basic steps below?*
+1 to the five steps and making the third question in the proposal the
first.
(2) How do we understand that consensus is reached about adding the
feature?
+1 to lazy consensus with one committer's +1
(3) To
19 matches
Mail list logo
