eral issues with memory
> managed in Kubernetes, most of them actually went away when we upgraded
> from Flink 1.9 to 1.13.
> >
> >Do we know why there's such a huge performance regression? Can we improve
> this somehow with some flag tweaking? It would be great if we see a
nk 1.9
>to 1.13.
>
>Do we know why there's such a huge performance regression? Can we improve this
>somehow with some flag tweaking? It would be great if we see a more in depth
>explanation of the gains vs losses of upgrading.
>
>On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 3:08 PM Stephan Ewen
>mailto:se...@apache.org&g
e heavy users of RocksDB and have had several issues with memory
> managed in Kubernetes, most of them actually went away when we upgraded
> from Flink 1.9 to 1.13.
>
> Do we know why there's such a huge performance regression? Can we improve
> this somehow with some flag twea
We are heavy users of RocksDB and have had several issues with memory
managed in Kubernetes, most of them actually went away when we upgraded
from Flink 1.9 to 1.13.
Do we know why there's such a huge performance regression? Can we improve
this somehow with some flag tweaking? It would be great if
hy there's such a huge performance regression? Can we improve
> this somehow with some flag tweaking? It would be great if we see a more in
> depth explanation of the gains vs losses of upgrading.
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 3:08 PM Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
>
>
> -
1 at 3:08 PM Stephan Ewen
mailto:se...@apache.org>> wrote:
From: Nico Kruber mailto:n...@apache.org>>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 0:10
To: u...@flink.apache.org<mailto:u...@flink.apache.org>
mailto:u...@flink.apache.org>>; dev
mailto:dev@
gt;>
>> We are heavy users of RocksDB and have had several issues with memory
>> managed in Kubernetes, most of them actually went away when we upgraded
>> from Flink 1.9 to 1.13.
>>
>> Do we know why there's such a huge performance regression? Can we improve
>>
sses of upgrading.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 3:08 PM Stephan Ewen
mailto:se...@apache.org>> wrote:
From: Nico Kruber
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 0:10
To: u...@flink.apache.org ; dev
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] RocksDB Version Upgrade and Performance
That'
That's actually also what I'm seeing most of the time and what I'd expect to
improve with the newer RocksDB version.
Hence, I'd also favour the upgrade even if there is a slight catch with
respect to performance - we should, however, continue to investigate this
together with the RocksDB communi
For the details of what causes this regression, I would add @Yun Tang
to this discussion.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 2:36 PM Yuval Itzchakov wrote:
> We are heavy users of RocksDB and have had several issues with memory
> managed in Kubernetes, most of them actually went away when we upgraded
> fro
I am hearing quite often from users who are struggling to manage memory
usage, and these are all users using RocksDB. While I don't know for
certain that RocksDB is the cause in every case, from my perspective,
getting the better memory stability of version 6.20 in place is critical.
Regards,
Davi
Hi all!
*!!! If you are a big user of the Embedded RocksDB State Backend and have
performance sensitive workloads, please read this !!!*
I want to quickly raise some awareness for a RocksDB version upgrade we
plan to do, and some possible impact on application performance.
*We plan to upgrade R
12 matches
Mail list logo
