Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

. Very reasonable analysis! >> >> Best, >> Zhijiang >> >> -- >> From:Hequn Cheng >> Send Time:2020 Mar. 27 (Fri.) 09:46 >> To:dev >> Cc:private >> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions >> Dockerfiles >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

gt; Zhijiang > > -- > From:Hequn Cheng > Send Time:2020 Mar. 27 (Fri.) 09:46 > To:dev > Cc:private > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions > Dockerfiles > > +1 for a separate repos

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

+1 for this proposal. Very reasonable analysis! Best, Zhijiang -- From:Hequn Cheng Send Time:2020 Mar. 27 (Fri.) 09:46 To:dev Cc:private Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles +1

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

+1 for a separate repository. Best, Gary On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:46 AM Hequn Cheng wrote: > +1 for a separate repository. > The dedicated `flink-docker` repo works fine now. We can do it similarly. > > Best, > Hequn > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:16 AM Till Rohrmann > wrote: > > > +1 for a

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

+1 for a separate repository. The dedicated `flink-docker` repo works fine now. We can do it similarly. Best, Hequn On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:16 AM Till Rohrmann wrote: > +1 for a separate repository. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:13 PM Ufuk Celebi wrote: > > > +1. > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

+1 for a separate repository. Cheers, Till On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:13 PM Ufuk Celebi wrote: > +1. > > The repo creation process is a light-weight, automated process on the ASF > side. When Patrick Lucas contributed docker-flink back to the Flink > community (as flink-docker), there was

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

+1. The repo creation process is a light-weight, automated process on the ASF side. When Patrick Lucas contributed docker-flink back to the Flink community (as flink-docker), there was virtually no overhead in creating the repository. Reusing build scripts should still be possible at the cost of

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

+1 to use a dedicated repository. All reasons listed in the proposal make sense to me. Best Regards, Yu On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 23:56, Igal Shilman wrote: > +1 for a separate repository. > > Thanks, > Igal > > On Thursday, March 26, 2020, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > +1 to a separate repository.

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

+1 for a separate repository. Thanks, Igal On Thursday, March 26, 2020, Stephan Ewen wrote: > +1 to a separate repository. > > It seems to be best practice in the docker community. > And since it does not add overhead, why not go with the best practice? > > Best, > Stephan > > > On Thu, Mar

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

+1 to a separate repository. It seems to be best practice in the docker community. And since it does not add overhead, why not go with the best practice? Best, Stephan On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:15 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > Hi Flink devs, > > As part of a Stateful Functions release, we

[DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles

Hi Flink devs, As part of a Stateful Functions release, we would like to publish Stateful Functions Docker images to Dockerhub as an official image. Some background context on Stateful Function images, for those who are not familiar with the project yet: - Stateful Function images are built