s proposal. Very reasonable analysis!
>>
>> Best,
>> Zhijiang
>>
>> --
>> From:Hequn Cheng
>> Send Time:2020 Mar. 27 (Fri.) 09:46
>> To:dev
>> Cc:private
>> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions
>> Dockerfiles
>&g
t; Best,
> Zhijiang
>
> --
> From:Hequn Cheng
> Send Time:2020 Mar. 27 (Fri.) 09:46
> To:dev
> Cc:private
> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions
> Dockerfiles
>
> +1 for a sepa
+1 for this proposal. Very reasonable analysis!
Best,
Zhijiang
--
From:Hequn Cheng
Send Time:2020 Mar. 27 (Fri.) 09:46
To:dev
Cc:private
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a new repo to host Stateful Functions Dockerfiles
+1 for a
+1 for a separate repository.
Best,
Gary
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:46 AM Hequn Cheng wrote:
> +1 for a separate repository.
> The dedicated `flink-docker` repo works fine now. We can do it similarly.
>
> Best,
> Hequn
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:16 AM Till Rohrmann
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for a se
+1 for a separate repository.
The dedicated `flink-docker` repo works fine now. We can do it similarly.
Best,
Hequn
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:16 AM Till Rohrmann wrote:
> +1 for a separate repository.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:13 PM Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > T
+1 for a separate repository.
Cheers,
Till
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:13 PM Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> +1.
>
> The repo creation process is a light-weight, automated process on the ASF
> side. When Patrick Lucas contributed docker-flink back to the Flink
> community (as flink-docker), there was virtua
+1.
The repo creation process is a light-weight, automated process on the ASF
side. When Patrick Lucas contributed docker-flink back to the Flink
community (as flink-docker), there was virtually no overhead in creating
the repository. Reusing build scripts should still be possible at the cost
of s
+1 to use a dedicated repository. All reasons listed in the proposal make
sense to me.
Best Regards,
Yu
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 23:56, Igal Shilman wrote:
> +1 for a separate repository.
>
> Thanks,
> Igal
>
> On Thursday, March 26, 2020, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> > +1 to a separate repository.
+1 for a separate repository.
Thanks,
Igal
On Thursday, March 26, 2020, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> +1 to a separate repository.
>
> It seems to be best practice in the docker community.
> And since it does not add overhead, why not go with the best practice?
>
> Best,
> Stephan
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26,
+1 to a separate repository.
It seems to be best practice in the docker community.
And since it does not add overhead, why not go with the best practice?
Best,
Stephan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:15 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
wrote:
> Hi Flink devs,
>
> As part of a Stateful Functions release, we w
Hi Flink devs,
As part of a Stateful Functions release, we would like to publish Stateful
Functions Docker images to Dockerhub as an official image.
Some background context on Stateful Function images, for those who are not
familiar with the project yet:
- Stateful Function images are built o
11 matches
Mail list logo