[DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2021-12-08 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi all, Flink supports multiple file systems [1] which includes MapR FS. MapR as a company doesn't exist anymore since 2019, the technology and intellectual property has been sold to Hewlett Packard. I don't think that there's anyone who's using MapR anymore and therefore I think it would be good

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2021-12-09 Thread Seth Wiesman
+1 I actually thought we had already dropped this FS. If anyone is still relying on it in production, the file system abstraction in Flink has been incredibly stable over the years. They should be able to use the 1.14 MapR FS with later versions of Flink. Seth On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 10:03 AM Mar

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2021-12-09 Thread Konstantin Knauf
+1 (what Seth said) On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:15 PM Seth Wiesman wrote: > +1 > > I actually thought we had already dropped this FS. If anyone is still > relying on it in production, the file system abstraction in Flink has been > incredibly stable over the years. They should be able to use the 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2021-12-09 Thread David Morávek
+1, agreed with Seth's reasoning. There has been no real activity in MapR FS module for years [1], so the eventual users should be good with using the jars from the older Flink versions for quite some time [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/commits/master/flink-filesystems/flink-mapr-fs Best, D.

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2022-01-05 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi everyone, Thanks for your input. I've checked the MapR implementation and it has no annotation at all. Given the circumstances that we thought that MapR was already dropped, I would propose to immediately remove MapR in Flink 1.15 instead of first marking it as deprecated and removing it in Fli

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2022-01-05 Thread Till Rohrmann
+1 for dropping the MapR FS. Cheers, Till On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:11 AM Martijn Visser wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks for your input. I've checked the MapR implementation and it has no > annotation at all. Given the circumstances that we thought that MapR was > already dropped, I would prop

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2022-01-09 Thread Yun Tang
+1 for dropping the MapR Fs. Best Yun Tang From: Till Rohrmann Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 18:33 To: Martijn Visser Cc: David Morávek ; dev ; Seth Wiesman ; User Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS +1 for dropping the MapR FS. Cheers, Till On Wed

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2022-01-11 Thread Chang Li
+1 for dropping the MapR FS. Till Rohrmann 于2022年1月5日周三 18:33写道: > +1 for dropping the MapR FS. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:11 AM Martijn Visser > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Thanks for your input. I've checked the MapR implementation and it has no > > annotation at a

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2022-01-11 Thread Jingsong Li
+1 for dropping the MapR FS. Thanks for driving. Best, Jingsong On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 5:22 PM Chang Li wrote: > > +1 for dropping the MapR FS. > > Till Rohrmann 于2022年1月5日周三 18:33写道: > > > +1 for dropping the MapR FS. > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:11 AM Martijn Vi

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2022-01-12 Thread Martijn Visser
Thanks everyone. We've moved forward with removing the MapR file system in Flink 1.15. On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 10:37, Jingsong Li wrote: > +1 for dropping the MapR FS. Thanks for driving. > > Best, > Jingsong > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 5:22 PM Chang Li wrote: > > > > +1 for dropping the MapR FS