apache.org/confluence/x/Xo_FD
>
> Thanks gain,
>
> Charles
>
> From: Zakelly Lan
> Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 at 5:55 AM
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Missing TreeMapState abstraction for maintaining
> ordered state
>
> Hi Charles,
>
> The
M
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Missing TreeMapState abstraction for maintaining ordered
state
Hi Charles,
There is a FLIP-220[1] and discussions[2] about introducing a sorted map
state in binary order. But it seems like there is no further progress and
conclusion. It would be nice if any
Hi All,
I've read through the FLIP and partially the discussion which is quite
exhausting. The intention looks interesting, the idea is +1.
If the FLIP goes forward then I've some questions which are touching the
fundamentals.
Without super deep consideration I've the feeling that we can realisti
Hi Charles,
There is a FLIP-220[1] and discussions[2] about introducing a sorted map
state in binary order. But it seems like there is no further progress and
conclusion. It would be nice if anyone could drive this.
I would +1 for introducing this. As the RocksDB stores key-value in binary
order,
Hi all,
I'm building a Flink application that processes real-time order book data (~70k
events/sec), partitioned by instrument.
For each key, I need to maintain an order book where levels are kept ordered by
price. Since Flink's state API doesn't support ordered structures like a
NavigableMap
