Re: [DISCUSS] PR component labeling

2021-11-25 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi Chesnay, It would be fine for me to have more high-over labels, like SQL, Connectors, Formats, FileSystems. Thanks, Martijn On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 16:33, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > @Martijn do you need all the various sublabels, or would one like SQL or > Connectors suffice? > > On 25/11/202

Re: [DISCUSS] PR component labeling

2021-11-25 Thread Chesnay Schepler
@Martijn do you need all the various sublabels, or would one like SQL or Connectors suffice? On 25/11/2021 16:28, Martijn Visser wrote: Hi Nico, I'm using the labels to filter on PRs that I find interesting (for example, I look at all the new or updated PRs that are related to SQL or connector

Re: [DISCUSS] PR component labeling

2021-11-25 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi Nico, I'm using the labels to filter on PRs that I find interesting (for example, I look at all the new or updated PRs that are related to SQL or connectors). Best regards, Martijn On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 16:17, Nicolaus Weidner < nicolaus.weid...@ververica.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > since we

[DISCUSS] PR component labeling

2021-11-25 Thread Nicolaus Weidner
Hi all, since we are currently working on several infrastructure topics, I would like to start a discussion on whether the component labeling on PRs is actually helping people. To be clear, I am talking about the blue labels like "component=Runtime/metrics" that are added by the omnipresent Robert