Hi Devs!
I would like to start a discussion about referencing the Flink Kubernetes
Operator directly from the Flink Kubernetes deployment documentation.
Currently the Flink deployment/resource provider docs provide some
information for the Standalone and Native Kubernetes integration without
any
I don't see a reason for why we shouldn't at least mention the operator
in the kubernetes docs.
On 12/10/2022 16:25, Gyula Fóra wrote:
Hi Devs!
I would like to start a discussion about referencing the Flink Kubernetes
Operator directly from the Flink Kubernetes deployment documentation.
Curre
+1 from my end to include the operator in the related Kubernetes sections
of the Flink docs
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:31 PM Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> I don't see a reason for why we shouldn't at least mention the operator
> in the kubernetes docs.
>
> On 12/10/2022 16:25, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > H
+1
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:03 PM Martijn Visser
wrote:
> +1 from my end to include the operator in the related Kubernetes sections
> of the Flink docs
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:31 PM Chesnay Schepler
> wrote:
>
> > I don't see a reason for why we shouldn't at least mention the operator
>
+1 for increasing the visibility of flink-kubernetes-operator.
Best,
Yang
Thomas Weise 于2022年10月13日周四 07:49写道：
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:03 PM Martijn Visser
> wrote:
>
> > +1 from my end to include the operator in the related Kubernetes sections
> > of the Flink docs
> >
> > On Wed
+1 good idea!
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:42 PM Yang Wang wrote:
> +1 for increasing the visibility of flink-kubernetes-operator.
>
> Best,
> Yang
>
> Thomas Weise 于2022年10月13日周四 07:49写道：
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:03 PM Martijn Visser >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 from my end to
+1 Agree, good idea!
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:52 PM Jing Ge wrote:
> +1 good idea!
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:42 PM Yang Wang wrote:
>
> > +1 for increasing the visibility of flink-kubernetes-operator.
> >
> > Best,
> > Yang
> >
> > Thomas Weise 于2022年10月13日周四 07:49写道：
> >
> > > +1
> > >
>
