Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-24 Thread Yun Tang
o: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2 Thanks a lot, Yun, Godfrey, and Jingsong for being our release managers! Creating these bug-fix releases will be super helpful for our users. Cheers, Till On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:59 AM Piotr Nowojski wrote: &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-22 Thread Xintong Song
would be great if we could get FLINK-23073 into 1.13.2. > There's > > > > > already > > > > > > an open PR and it unblocks upgrading the table API walkthrough in > > > > > > apache/flink-playgrounds to 1.13. > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-22 Thread Till Rohrmann
; already > > > > > an open PR and it unblocks upgrading the table API walkthrough in > > > > > apache/flink-playgrounds to 1.13. > > > > > > > > > > Seth > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-22 Thread Piotr Nowojski
; > > > > Seth > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 6:28 AM Yun Tang wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Dawid, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for driving this discussion, I am willing to volunteer as >

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-21 Thread Xintong Song
> > Hi Dawid, > > > > > > > > Thanks for driving this discussion, I am willing to volunteer as the > > > > release manager for these versions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best > > > > Yun Tang > > > > _

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-21 Thread Jingsong Li
t; release manager for these versions. > > > > > > > > > Best > > > Yun Tang > > > ________ > > > From: Konstantin Knauf > > > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 22:35 > > > To: dev > > > Subject: Re

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-21 Thread godfrey he
; release manager for these versions. > > > > > > Best > > Yun Tang > > > > From: Konstantin Knauf > > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 22:35 > > To: dev > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-21 Thread Seth Wiesman
r driving this discussion, I am willing to volunteer as the > release manager for these versions. > > > Best > Yun Tang > > From: Konstantin Knauf > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 22:35 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.1

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-21 Thread Yun Tang
Hi Dawid, Thanks for driving this discussion, I am willing to volunteer as the release manager for these versions. Best Yun Tang From: Konstantin Knauf Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 22:35 To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2 Hi

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-21 Thread Till Rohrmann
Thanks for starting this discussion Dawid. We have collected a couple of fixes for the different releases: #fixes: 1.11.4: 72 1.12.5: 35 1.13.2: 49 which in my opinion warrants new bugfix releases. Note that we intend to do another 1.11 release because of the seriousness of the FLINK-22815 [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-18 Thread Piotr Nowojski
Hi, Thanks for bringing this up. I think before releasing 1.12.x/1.13.x/1.14.x, it would be good to decide what to do with FLINK-23011 [1] and if there is a relatively easy fix, I would wait for it before releasing. Best, Piotrek [1] with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23011 pt.,

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-18 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Hi Dawid, Thank you for starting the discussion. I'd like to add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23025 to the list for Flink 1.13.2. Cheers, Konstantin On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 3:26 PM Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: > Hi devs, > > Quite recently we pushed, in our opinion, quite an

[DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.4, 1.12.5, 1.13.2

2021-06-18 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
Hi devs, Quite recently we pushed, in our opinion, quite an important fix[1] for unaligned checkpoints which disables UC for broadcast partitioning. Without the fix there might be some broadcast state corruption. Therefore we think it would be beneficial to release it soonish. What do you think?