Thanks for the information!
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:07 PM Gyula Fóra wrote:
> https://flink.apache.org/downloads/#update-policy-for-old-releases
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 8:47 PM Jing Ge
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Thanks! I have an off-track question: where could we find the
> reference
> > that
https://flink.apache.org/downloads/#update-policy-for-old-releases
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 8:47 PM Jing Ge wrote:
> +1 Thanks! I have an off-track question: where could we find the reference
> that the community only supports the last 2 minor releases? Thanks!
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Jing
>
> On
+1 Thanks! I have an off-track question: where could we find the reference
that the community only supports the last 2 minor releases? Thanks!
Best Regards,
Jing
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 3:13 PM Ahmed Hamdy wrote:
> Makes sense,
> Thanks for the clarification.
> Best Regards
> Ahmed Hamdy
>
>
Makes sense,
Thanks for the clarification.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 14:07, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> Hi Ahmed!
>
> As I mentioned in the first email, the Flink Operator explicitly aims to
> make running Flink and Flink Platforms on Kubernetes easy. As most users
> are
Hi Ahmed!
As I mentioned in the first email, the Flink Operator explicitly aims to
make running Flink and Flink Platforms on Kubernetes easy. As most users
are platform teams supporting Flink inside a company or running a service
it's basically always required to support several Flink versions at
Thanks Gyula,
+1 for the proposal in general.
May I ask why are we interested in supporting more than the ones supported
by the community?
for example I understand all versions prior to 1.16 are now out of support,
why should we tie our compatibility 4 versions behind?
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
+1
Yang Wang 于2023年9月14日周四 16:15写道：
> Since the users could always use the old Flink Kubernetes Operator version
> along with old Flink versions, I am totally in favor of this proposal to
> reduce maintenance burden.
>
> Best,
> Yang
>
> Biao Geng 于2023年9月6日周三 18:15写道：
>
> > +1 for the
Since the users could always use the old Flink Kubernetes Operator version
along with old Flink versions, I am totally in favor of this proposal to
reduce maintenance burden.
Best,
Yang
Biao Geng 于2023年9月6日周三 18:15写道：
> +1 for the proposal.
>
> Best,
> Biao Geng
>
> Gyula Fóra 于2023年9月6日周三
+1 for the proposal.
Best,
Biao Geng
Gyula Fóra 于2023年9月6日周三 16:10写道：
> @Zhanghao Chen:
>
> I am not completely sure at this point what this will mean for 2.0 simply
> because I am also not sure what that will mean for the operator as well :)
> I think this will depend on the compatibility
@Zhanghao Chen:
I am not completely sure at this point what this will mean for 2.0 simply
because I am also not sure what that will mean for the operator as well :)
I think this will depend on the compatibility guarantees we can provide
across Flink major versions in general. We have to look into
+1 Sounds good! Four releases give a decent amount of time to migrate
to the next Flink version.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:33 PM Őrhidi Mátyás wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:03 AM Thomas Weise wrote:
>
> > +1, thanks for the proposal
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:13 AM Gyula Fóra
+1
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:03 AM Thomas Weise wrote:
> +1, thanks for the proposal
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:13 AM Gyula Fóra wrote:
>
> > Hi All!
> >
> > @Maximilian Michels has raised the question of Flink
> > version support in the operator before the last release. I would like to
> >
+1, thanks for the proposal
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:13 AM Gyula Fóra wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> @Maximilian Michels has raised the question of Flink
> version support in the operator before the last release. I would like to
> open this discussion publicly so we can finalize this before the next
>
...@apache.org
主题: [DISSCUSS] Kubernetes Operator Flink Version Support Policy
Hi All!
@Maximilian Michels has raised the question of Flink
version support in the operator before the last release. I would like to
open this discussion publicly so we can finalize this before the next
release.
Background
Sounds good to me, thanks.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023, 8:12 AM Gyula Fóra wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> @Maximilian Michels has raised the question of Flink
> version support in the operator before the last release. I would like to
> open this discussion publicly so we can finalize this before the next
>
Hi All!
@Maximilian Michels has raised the question of Flink
version support in the operator before the last release. I would like to
open this discussion publicly so we can finalize this before the next
release.
Background:
Currently the Flink Operator supports all Flink versions since Flink
16 matches
Mail list logo
