It seems like there is general consensus. I have opened FLINK-18194 and
corresponding PRs against the docs and flink-playgrounds
Seth
[1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/12592
[2] https://github.com/apache/flink-playgrounds/pull/13
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:50 PM Konstantin Knauf
wrote:
>
Hi Seth,
I see, that's neat. I think it is a good idea moving the archetypes out of
the main repository into flink-playgrounds.
Best,
Konstantin
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:47 PM Seth Wiesman wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> I am linking my working branch for what the playground might look like.
IMO, having the walkthroughs as maven archetypes is not maintainable.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:47 PM Seth Wiesman wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> I am linking my working branch for what the playground might look like. It
> contains a Java application you can import into your IDE and then fill out
>
Hi Konstantin,
I am linking my working branch for what the playground might look like. It
contains a Java application you can import into your IDE and then fill out
the same way you do currently. It is still a code walkthrough. Docker
allows users to actually run the completed app locally and not
Hi Seth,
good catch! I agree this is important to fix.
I don't quite understand the resolution you are proposing. The current
walkthrough for the Table API is a *code *walkthrough. How do you plan to
replace this by a dockerized playground? Drop the code walkthrough and add
a pure SQL
I am very much in favour of this effort.
Best,
Dawid
On 09/06/2020 16:06, Seth Wiesman wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> I am currently going through the documentation for 1.11 and noticed an
> issue with the walkthroughs.
>
> Flink currently contains two walkthroughs for new users, one for data
>
Hi Everyone
I am currently going through the documentation for 1.11 and noticed an
issue with the walkthroughs.
Flink currently contains two walkthroughs for new users, one for data
stream and one for table[1, 2]. They both have corresponding maven
archetypes for users to create template
