Hi,
I am happy to say that FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc [1]
has been accepted.
The proposal has been accepted with 7 approving votes (3 binding) and there
are no disapproval (voted on this thread [2]):
Ahmed Hamdy (non-binding)
Aleksandr Pilipenko (non-binding)
Jeyhun
Hmm sorry, I will try to search consensus..
I read 3 Votes but miss the binding part..
On 2024/05/16 01:36:46 Rui Fan wrote:
> Thanks Joao Boto for driving the FLIP. We need 3 +1(binding)
> votes according to Flink Bylaws[1] before the community accepts it.
>
> You can search "Consensus"
Well, I give my +1 (non-binding), but we need more binding votes :)
Looking forward to see this approved and see the changes.
On May 16, 2024 at 03:37 +0200, Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> Thanks Joao Boto for driving the FLIP. We need 3 +1(binding)
> votes according to Flink Bylaws[1]
Thanks Joao Boto for driving the FLIP. We need 3 +1(binding)
votes according to Flink Bylaws[1] before the community accepts it.
You can search "Consensus" and "FLIP (Major Change)" keywords
in this wiki.
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Bylaws
Best,
Rui
On Thu, May
Hi,
I am happy to say that FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc [1]
has been accepted.
The proposal has been accepted with 5 approving votes (1 binding) and there
are no disapproval (voted on this thread [2]):
Rui Fan (binding)
Yuepeng Pan (non-binding)
Aleksandr Pilipenko
