Re: [RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

David, Thanks for making the design better! I count on you to pinpoint bugs as early as possible in the upcoming PRs. I'm just testing the first one on cluster, hope I can file it in the couple of days... BR, G On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 9:27 AM David Morávek wrote: > Thanks Gabor for driving

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

Thanks Gabor for driving this, I think the change is going to be really valuable for some of the enterprise users. Best, D. On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:33 AM Gabor Somogyi wrote: > Hi devs, > > FLIP-211 [1] Has been accepted. > There were 3 binding votes and 2 non-binding in favor. > None

[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

Hi devs, FLIP-211 [1] Has been accepted. There were 3 binding votes and 2 non-binding in favor. None against. Votes are in the order of arrival: Binding: Gyula Fora Marton Balassi Chesnay Schepler Non-binding: Junfan Zhang David Moravek [1]

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

+1 (binding) On 21/01/2022 15:57, Gabor Somogyi wrote: Hi devs, I would like to start the vote for FLIP-211 [1], which was discussed and reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2]. The vote will be open for at least 72h, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. BR, G [1]

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

The updated FLIP looks good to me. Thanks Gabor for addressing the comments and updating the FLIP. +1 (non-binding) D. On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:16 AM Márton Balassi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Given [1] I consider the issue David raised resolved. Thanks David and > please confirm here. > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

+1 (binding) Given [1] I consider the issue David raised resolved. Thanks David and please confirm here. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/cvwknd5fhohj0wfv8mfwn70jwpjvxrjj On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:07 AM David Morávek wrote: > Hi Gabor, > > Thanks for driving this. This is headed in a

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

Hi Gabor, Thanks for driving this. This is headed in a right direction, but I feel that the FLIP still might need bit more work. -1 (non-binding) until the discussion thread is resolved [1]. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/cvwknd5fhohj0wfv8mfwn70jwpjvxrjj Best, D. On Mon, Jan 24, 2022

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

Hi Gabor, +1 (binding) from me This is a great effort and significant improvement to the Kerberos security story . Cheers Gyula On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 15:58, Gabor Somogyi wrote: > Hi devs, > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-211 [1], which was discussed and > reached a consensus in

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

Hi Junfan, For FLIP votes, the votes of committers and PMC members are binding. All other votes are non-binding. More details for Flink's voting process can be found here [1]. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Bylaws#FlinkBylaws-Voting Cheers, Till On Fri, Jan 21,

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

+1 Thanks for driving this. By the way does the process of voting is only for Flink committer and not contributors? I’m not familiar and it’s my first voting. Best, JunFan. On Jan 21, 2022, 10:57 PM +0800, Gabor Somogyi , wrote: > Hi devs, > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-211 [1],

[VOTE] FLIP-211: Kerberos delegation token framework

Hi devs, I would like to start the vote for FLIP-211 [1], which was discussed and reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2]. The vote will be open for at least 72h, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. BR, G [1]