Thanks for the votes!
We have 2 +1's from Congxian and Aljoscha.
Since there are no disapproving votes and the voting time has passed, I
will see this FLIP as approved to be adopted into Apache Flink.
@Aljoscha Krettek
Yes, some interface naming in the doc should also be correspondingly
updated.
+1
With the restriction that it should be “canonical format”/“unified format” (or
something like it) and not save point format, i.e. not
KeyedBackendSavepointStrategyBase in the doc, for example
Aljoscha
> On 17. Jun 2019, at 14:05, Congxian Qiu wrote:
>
> +1 from my side.
> Best,
> Congxian
+1 from my side.
Best,
Congxian
Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai 于2019年6月17日周一 上午10:20写道：
> Hi Flink devs,
>
> I want to officially start a voting thread to formally adopt FLIP-41 [1].
>
> There are two relevant discussions threads for this feature [2] [3].
>
> The voting time will end on June 19th 17:00 CE
Hi Flink devs,
I want to officially start a voting thread to formally adopt FLIP-41 [1].
There are two relevant discussions threads for this feature [2] [3].
The voting time will end on June 19th 17:00 CET.
Cheers,
Gordon
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-41:+Unify+Key
