+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 05:33, ConradJam wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Biao Geng 于2024年4月26日周五 18:45写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Biao Geng
> >
> >
> > gongzhongqiang 于2024年4月26日周五 00:41写道：
> >
> > > +1( (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > >
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce that FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
[1] has
been accepted with 9 approving votes (4 binding) [2].
I would like to thank everyone who took part in the discussion and/or voted.
- Rui Fan (binding)
- Ferenc Csaky (non-binding)
- Gyula Fora (binding)
+1 (non-binding)
Biao Geng 于2024年4月26日周五 18:45写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Biao Geng
>
>
> gongzhongqiang 于2024年4月26日周五 00:41写道：
>
> > +1( (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Zhongqiang Gong
> >
> > Mate Czagany 于2024年4月24日周三 16:06写道：
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Biao Geng
gongzhongqiang 于2024年4月26日周五 00:41写道：
> +1( (non-binding)
>
>
> Best,
> Zhongqiang Gong
>
> Mate Czagany 于2024年4月24日周三 16:06写道：
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State
> > Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion
+1( (non-binding)
Best,
Zhongqiang Gong
Mate Czagany 于2024年4月24日周三 16:06写道：
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State
> Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an
Ah, true -- now I remember. Thanks for fixing the wiki page
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:40 PM Gyula Fóra wrote:
> That's my fault @Robert Metzger , since the new FLIP
> process and a lack of confluent access for non-committers this is a bit
> tricky to get it sync :)
>
> Gyula
>
>
That's my fault @Robert Metzger , since the new FLIP
process and a lack of confluent access for non-committers this is a bit
tricky to get it sync :)
Gyula
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:17 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> In principle I'm +1 on the proposal, but I think the FLIP in the wiki is
> not in
In principle I'm +1 on the proposal, but I think the FLIP in the wiki is
not in sync with the Google doc.
For example in the Wiki FlinkStateSnapshotSpec.backoffLimit is missing.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:27 PM Thomas Weise wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:14 AM Yuepeng Pan
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:14 AM Yuepeng Pan wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
>
> Best,
> Yuepeng Pan
>
> At 2024-04-24 16:05:07, "Rui Fan" <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >+1(binding)
> >
> >Best,
> >Rui
> >
> >On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
>
+1(non-binding)
Best,
Yuepeng Pan
At 2024-04-24 16:05:07, "Rui Fan" <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1(binding)
>
>Best,
>Rui
>
>On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State
>> Snapshot CRD [1].
+1(binding)
Best,
Rui
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State
> Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection
+1 (binding)
Gyula
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:07 AM Ferenc Csaky
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), looking forward to this!
>
> Best,
> Ferenc
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 24th, 2024 at 10:03, Mate Czagany
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446:
+1 (non-binding), looking forward to this!
Best,
Ferenc
On Wednesday, April 24th, 2024 at 10:03, Mate Czagany
wrote:
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State
> Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2].
>
> The vote will be
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State
Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or
insufficient votes.
[1]
14 matches
Mail list logo
