Thanks all. This vote is now closed, I'll announce the results in a
separate thread.
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 6:06 AM Leonard Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - built from source code succeeded
> - verified signatures
> - verified hashsums
> - checked Github release tag
> - checked release notes
> -
+1 (binding)
- built from source code succeeded
- verified signatures
- verified hashsums
- checked Github release tag
- checked release notes
- checked the contents of maven repo
- reviewed the web PR
Best,
Leonard
> 2023年4月21日 上午1:07,Ahmed Hamdy 写道:
>
> + (non-binding)
> - Verified
+ (non-binding)
- Verified signature and hashes are correct.
- Verified there are no binaries in the source archive
- Verified tag in github
- reviewed and approved web PR
- build source successfully
Best Regards
Ahmed
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 16:50, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -
+1 (binding)
- Release notes look ok
- Verified signature/hashes of source archive
- Verified there are no binaries in the source archive
- Contents of Maven repo look good
- Verified NOTICE files
- Tag exists in Github
- Reviewed web PR
Not a blocker
- Copyright year in NOTICE file needs to be
+1 (binding)
- Validated hashes
- Verified signature
- Verified that no binaries exist in the source archive
- Build the source with Maven
- Verified licenses
- Verified web PRs
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 1:51 PM Andriy Redko wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), thank you Martijn!
>
> MV> Hi everyone,
>
+1 (non-binding), thank you Martijn!
MV> Hi everyone,
MV> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 3.0.1,
MV> as follows:
MV> [ ] +1, Approve the release
MV> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
MV> This version supports both Flink
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 3.0.1,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This version supports both Flink 1.16.x and Flink 1.17.x
The complete staging area is available for