> assume that in your proposal when jobReady is true, then
> UpgradeCompleted
> > condition would not be present and ClusterReady would always be true? I
> > know conditions do not need to be orthogonal, but I wanted to check what
> > your thoughts are.
> >
related readiness condition related to it’s
> > health would be useful; you suggest it be user configurable – this seems
> > closer to a liveliness / readiness probe.
> >
> > Kind regards, David.
> >
> > From: Mate Czagany
> > Date: Thursday, 30 May 2024 at 10:39
gt; closer to a liveliness / readiness probe.
>
> Kind regards, David.
>
> From: Mate Czagany
> Date: Thursday, 30 May 2024 at 10:39
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Cc: morh...@apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
> Hi,
>
> I
and ClusterReady would always be true? I
> > know conditions do not need to be orthogonal, but I wanted to check what
> > your thoughts are.
> >
> > Kind regards, David.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Gyula Fóra
> > Date: Wednesday, 29 May 2024
always be true? I
> > know conditions do not need to be orthogonal, but I wanted to check what
> > your thoughts are.
> >
> > Kind regards, David.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Gyula Fóra
> > Date: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 15:28
&
om: Gyula Fóra
> Date: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 15:28
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Cc: morh...@apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
> Hi David!
>
> This change definitely warrants a FLIP even if the code ch
thoughts are.
Kind regards, David.
From: Gyula Fóra
Date: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 15:28
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Cc: morh...@apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
Hi David!
This change definitely warrants a FLIP even if the code change
ils.
>
> I wonder whether this change is big enough to warrant a Flip, as it is so
> small. We could do this in an issue. WDYT?
>
> Kind regards, David.
>
>
> From: Lajith Koova
> Date: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 13:41
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DISC
to provide more details.
I wonder whether this change is big enough to warrant a Flip, as it is so
small. We could do this in an issue. WDYT?
Kind regards, David.
From: Lajith Koova
Date: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 13:41
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S
Hello ,
Discussion thread here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/dvy8w17pyjv68c3t962w49frl9odoz4z to
discuss a proposal to add Conditions field in the CR status of Flink
Deployment and FlinkSessionJob.
Note : Starting this new thread as discussion thread title has been
modified to follow the
10 matches
Mail list logo