Hi squirrels,
I've been meaning to merge a PR (#1520), but my local maven build gets
stuck at
org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest.
It looks like a deadlock.. The build just hangs there and top shows no
CPU/memory load. Anyone else has experienced the same? I'm on O
This happened locally on your machine?
Can you dump the stack-trace and post it? "jps >
stacktrace.txt" or so...
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi squirrels,
>
> I've been meaning to merge a PR (#1520), but my local maven build gets
> st
Locally yes.
Here's the stack trace:
2015-09-21 22:22:46
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.75-b04 mixed mode):
"Attach Listener" daemon prio=5 tid=0x7ff9d104e800 nid=0x4013 waiting
on condition [0x]
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
"Service Thread" d
I am actually very happy that it is not the
"BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest", that would be hell to debug...
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Ah, actually it is a different test. I think you got confused by the
> sysout log, because multiple parallel tests print there (tha
Ah, actually it is a different test. I think you got confused by the sysout
log, because multiple parallel tests print there (that makes it not always
obvious which one hangs).
The test is the "SocketClientSinkTest.testSocketSinkRetryAccess()" test.
You can see that by looking in which test case t
Yes, you're right. BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest has actually finished :-)
Sorry for the confusion! I'll wait for your fix then, thanks!
On 21 September 2015 at 22:51, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> I am actually very happy that it is not the
> "BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest", that would be hell to deb
@Stephan, have you pushed that fix for SocketClientSinkTest? Local builds
still hang for me :S
On 21 September 2015 at 22:55, Vasiliki Kalavri
wrote:
> Yes, you're right. BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest has actually finished
> :-)
> Sorry for the confusion! I'll wait for your fix then, thanks!
>
I have pushed it, yes. If you rebase onto the latest master, it should work.
If you can verify that it still hangs, can you post a stack trace dump?
Thanks,
Stephan
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Stephan, have you pushed that fix for S
Hi,
It's the latest master I'm trying to build, but it still hangs.
Here's the trace:
-
2015-09-23 13:48:41
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.75-b04 mixed mode):
"Attach Listener" daemon prio=5 tid=0x7faeb984a000 nid=0x3707 waiting
on conditio
Same here.
> On 23 Sep 2015, at 13:50, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's the latest master I'm trying to build, but it still hangs.
> Here's the trace:
>
> -
> 2015-09-23 13:48:41
> Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.75-b04 mixed mode):
>
Okay, will look into this is a bit today...
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> Same here.
>
> > On 23 Sep 2015, at 13:50, Vasiliki Kalavri
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's the latest master I'm trying to build, but it still hangs.
> > Here's the trace:
> >
> > --
It hangs for me too at the same test when doing "clean verify"
> On 23 Sep 2015, at 16:09, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> Okay, will look into this is a bit today...
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
>> Same here.
>>
>>> On 23 Sep 2015, at 13:50, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> wrote:
I’ve pushed a fix.
> On 23 Sep 2015, at 16:28, Paris Carbone wrote:
>
> It hangs for me too at the same test when doing "clean verify"
>
>> On 23 Sep 2015, at 16:09, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>>
>> Okay, will look into this is a bit today...
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrot
Turned out it was due to different behavior of Sockets under Ubuntu
(Debian) and OS/X (BSD)
That why it did not happen for Travis and me...
+1 for OS diversity among committers :-)
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> I’ve pushed a fix.
>
> > On 23 Sep 2015, at 16:28, Paris Ca
Thank you both! I verify that it's solved now :)
On 23 September 2015 at 20:00, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Turned out it was due to different behavior of Sockets under Ubuntu
> (Debian) and OS/X (BSD)
>
> That why it did not happen for Travis and me...
>
> +1 for OS diversity among committers :-)
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
