Hi Flink Team,
The Iceberg table maintenance proposal is on vote on the Iceberg dev list
[1].
Non-binding votes are important too, so if you are interested, please vote.
Thanks,
Peter
[1] - https://lists.apache.org/thread/qhz17ppdbb57ql356j49qqk3nyk59rvm
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 08:35 Péter Váry
Thanks Peter for forwarding this.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 05:51, Péter Váry wrote:
> Forwarding the invite for the discussion we plan to do with the Iceberg
> folks, as some of you might be interested in this.
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Brian Olsen
Thanks Wenjin for your response.
See my answers below:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 04:08 wenjin wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> Thanks a lot for your answers, this detailed explanation has cleared my
> confusions and been greatly beneficial to me. If you don't mind, could I
> discuss two more questions with your
Hi Peter,
Thanks a lot for your answers, this detailed explanation has cleared my
confusions and been greatly beneficial to me. If you don't mind, could I
discuss two more questions with your？
As you mentioned in your proposal and answers, the maintenance tasks may cause
resource interference a
Hi Wenjin,
See my answers below:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024, 10:54 wenjin wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I am interested in your proposal and think make iceberg Flink Connector
> support running maintenance task is meaningful . If possible, could you
> help me clarify a few confusions.
>
> - When the iceberg
Hi Peter,
I am interested in your proposal and think make iceberg Flink Connector support
running maintenance task is meaningful . If possible, could you help me clarify
a few confusions.
- When the iceberg table is written by single Flink job (use case1, 2)，the
maintenance tasks will be added
