Hi Venkata krishnan,
My general point was that personally I do not think that the
current implementation is wrong or confusing. And the main thing
here is that how we define consistent in this case is subjective.
>From the proposed point of view, consistent mean we use the same
prefix. But we can
Sorry for the late reply, Ferenc.
I understand the rationale behind the current implementation as the problem
is slightly different b/w yarn (always prefixed with `yarn`) and hadoop (it
is not guaranteed all `hadoop` configs will be prefixed by `hadoop`)
configs.
>From the dev UX perspective, it
Hi Venkata,
Thank you for opening the discussion about this!
After taking a look at the YARN and Hadoop configurations, the
reason why it was implemented this way is that, in case of YARN,
every YARN-specific property is prefixed with "yarn.", so to get
the final, YARN-side property it is enough
