pache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19035
>
> Best,
> Yun Tang
>
> From: Aljoscha Krettek
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 16:45
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API
>
> Did
r releases (1.0, 2.0, etc.) can
>>>> break APIs
>>>> with this annotation. Hence, I believe that we cannot simply remove
>>>> them
>>>> unless the community decides to change the stability guarantees we
>>>> give or
>>>> by making t
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19035
Best,
Yun Tang
From: Aljoscha Krettek
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 16:45
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API
Did you consider DataStream.project() yet
g 18 03:52:44 2020
*Recipients:*Dawid Wysakowicz
*CC:*dev , user
*Subject:*Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API
+1 for removing them.
From a quick look, most of them (not all) have been deprecated a long
time ago.
Cheers,
Kostas
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:3
ons, but not available to other
>>> commonly used UDF like Source or AsyncFunction[1].
>>>
>>> One temporary solution occurs to me is to add a ProcessFunction after
>>> the operators want to use side-output. But I think the solution is not very
>>> d
it really works we might add it to the
>> document of side-output.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7954
>>
>> Best,
>> Yun
>>
>> --Original Mail --
>> *Sender:*Kostas Kloud
t; *CC:*dev mailto:dev@flink.apache.org>>,
> user mailto:u...@flink.apache.org>>
> *Subject:*Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from
> DataStream API
>
> +1 for removing them.
>
>
>
> From a quick look,
he.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7954
>
> Best,
> Yun
>
> --Original Mail --
> *Sender:*Kostas Kloudas
> *Send Date:*Tue Aug 18 03:52:44 2020
> *Recipients:*Dawid Wysakowicz
> *CC:*dev , user
> *Subject:*Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStrea
+1 for removing the methods that are deprecated for a while & have alternative
methods.
One specific thing is that if we remove the DataStream#split, do we consider
enabling side-output in more operators in the future ? Currently it should be
only available in ProcessFunctions, but not
+1 for removing them.
>From a quick look, most of them (not all) have been deprecated a long time ago.
Cheers,
Kostas
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:37 PM Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:
>
> @David Yes, my idea was to remove any use of fold method and all related
> classes including WindowedStream#fold
>
@David Yes, my idea was to remove any use of fold method and all related
classes including WindowedStream#fold
@Klou Good idea to also remove the deprecated enableCheckpointing() &
StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile and alike. I did another pass over
some of the classes and thought we could also
I assume that along with DataStream#fold you would also
remove WindowedStream#fold.
I'm in favor of going ahead with all of these.
David
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:53 AM Dawid Wysakowicz
wrote:
> Hi devs and users,
>
> I wanted to ask you what do you think about removing some of the
>
Thanks a lot for starting this Dawid,
Big +1 for the proposed clean-up, and I would also add the deprecated
methods of the StreamExecutionEnvironment like:
enableCheckpointing(long interval, CheckpointingMode mode, boolean force)
enableCheckpointing()
isForceCheckpointing()
13 matches
Mail list logo
